(Lisää uutisia Twitter-tililläni tässä ja Gabissa tässä. Aihekohtaiset uutiset löydät ylävalikosta ja ennen lokakuuta 2020 sivustolleni postaamat uutiset tässä.)
3.3.2021:
Mielipiteeni huomiseen, "valevaltamedian hypettämään 4. maaliskuuta" liittyen: 6. tammikuuta nähty "sudet lampaiden vaatteissa" (= Antifan terroristit isänmaallisten MAGA-lippiksissä) uusitaan, ja FF:t mahdollisia.
Kommentti edelliseen (Twitteristä): Eivät näytä täyttyvän Belgiassakaan. Kukaan ei kuuntele sulkuja vaan jengi ampasi ulos kauniiseen ilmaan. Poliisit seisoo mahtamatta asialle mitään. (Video 1:12)
Parkes: 1ST MARCH UPDATE CURRENT NEWS Aiheina mm. Trump kutsui Buydenia nimellä Chief Executive (CEO?) eli (entisen) USA corporaation johtaja; Trump sanoi myös ettei Buyden tule palaamaan Valkoiseen taloon; Monet pankit vähentämässä radikaalisti henkilökuntaansa uuden rahajärjestelmän edellä + kuka manipuloi kultaa (min 13>)
Lukijan kynästä: Mielenilmaukset koronavapauden puolesta jatkuvat Hallituksen viimeaikaiset uhkaukset rajoittaa ankarasti suomalaisten kokoontumisvapautta ovat alkaneet poikia kansalaisaktivismia eri puolilla Suomea – lukija kirjoittaa Partisaanille tunnelmista Oulun mielenosoituksessa.
IL noudattaa valtamedian "julkaistaan muutama prosentti järkiuutisia että kansa luulee meidän tekevän hyvää työtä" -linjaa: 2,3 miljoonaa suomalaista latasi Koronavilkun, hyödyistä ei näyttöä – ylilääkäri: ”Aivan turhaa puuhastelua”
Nearly 50 million Americans are now vaccinated with an unproven, experimental vaccine that rewrites protein synthesis in the body. Its effects are irreversible. Over the next 18 months or so, we're going to find out how many of these 50+ million people will die from this rushed, dangerous vaccine. These are people who claim to believe in "science," even if the vaccine makers don't.
Explosives found in an abandoned vehicle in the vicinity of India's billionaire Mukesh Ambani's residence.
Netherlands has become first EU country to join Canada and the US, by recognizing Uighur Muslims treatment by China as genocide. Dutch parliament passed the motion today.
The House has passed the Equality Act, which would expand federal protections for LGBTQ people by prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
Algerian protests, also called Revolution of Smiles or #Hirak Movement is back and people are marching in large numbers.
Joe Biden and his press chief have been accused of hypocrisy after old tweets slamming the Trump administration's Middle East air strikes resurfaced following last night's bombing raid on Syria.
Crowd chants “CNN sucks” and Fake News as they saw Jim Acosta at the #CPAC2021 at Hyatt Hotel.
Genealogy firm MyHeritage has created an AI tool that brings still images of DEAD relatives to life using DEEPFAKE technology. The technology is called Deep Nostalgia.
Biden admin preparing order for enhanced airport screenings for Ebola
Kommenttini edellisiin "surullisiin" videoihin liittyen: Olemme sodassa, ja on todella epärealistista odottaa kaikkien selviytyvän tästä terveinä/hengissä. Mutta pian tämä on ohi, ja meitä odottaa "sodaton ja psykopaatiton" maailma, jossa kaikille on mm. ruokaa ja terveyttä. Mitä useammalle ihmiselle jaamme "totuutta", sen nopeammin saavutamme "paratiisimme". Älä ota rokotetta.
Kumpi näistä on Buyden? Vai kampi (Katso esim korvia. Kuka operoi korvanlehtensä? Lisää näitä hassuja kuvia löydät pilvin pimein. Oma kuvakaappaukseni):
New York police department deploys robot dog in Bronx.
Explosion and massive fire after a train collided with an 18-wheeler outside Cameron, Texas. Homes and businesses are being evacuated. (Toim: Ketkä matkustivat junassa? Q:n mukaan 70% lento-onnettomuuksista on "täsmämurhia". Muista republikaanikansanedustajien surullinen junamatka kolme vuotta sitten.)
Female TV cartoon characters must wear hijab: Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei.
“Get well soon, Tiger. You are a true champion!” - Donald Trump to Tiger Woods.
Ercot (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) chair and vice chair resign from board: Filing.
New Jersey nursing home resident who tested positive for COVID on her 105th birthday after getting her second vaccine shot beats the virus and credits her survival on consuming nine gin-soaked raisins a day (Toim: Kiniini)
A financial snapshot shared exclusively with the AP shows the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation took over $90 million last year. The report does not state who gave the money in 2020, and leaders declined to name prominent donors.
US Steps In After Reports That China Dams Continue to Hinder Water Flow on the Mekong River "... Consult with downstream countries."
Man with swastika on forehead accused of randomly attacking woman with flamethrower in Perth, Australia (Toim: Pidetään natsit otsikoissa ja unohdetaan kommunistit, jotka ovat tappaneet "100 kertaa enemmän ihmisiä")
Lin Wood: A few very suspicious or fake channels on telegram using the names of well known conservative people. They seem to follow the same pattern, at first they're careful with what is posted as to seem authentic then BAM! The whole tone changes.
Remain vigilant and keep your guard up on all social platforms and information sources
22.2.2021:
Tiihonen vieraana Totuuden EtsijöissäAiheina mm. Mediapooli ja "koronamurhat". Otteita: Rauman telakalla "turhaan testattu" PCR:llä - 80-90% PCR-positiivisista on virheellisiä, ns. kylmiä positiivisia, eli vanhojen virusten tai niiden ”palasten” aiheuttamia ... Kun suhteuttaa Ruotsin kuolemat väestönkasvuun ja ottaa huomioon talvikuukausien vaikutuksen, ylikuolleisuus siellä häviää ... Viranomaiset Suomessa kieltäytyvät antamasta tietoja, ja se on lainvastaista ... Suomen sairaaloissa ei ole poikkeuksellisia määriä potilaita ... Samaa vanhusta on testattu jopa seitsemän kertaa ... Hulluin lukemani juttu oli Etelä-Karjalassa, siellä oli yksi tai kaksi (?) ihmistä todettu koronapositiivisiksi, ja tuo uutisoitiin 100% kasvuna [törkeää pelottelua] ... Jo 100 vuotta on tiedetty etteivät maskit auta [Espanjantauti] ... Mitään koronarokotetta ei kannata ottaa [koska niitä ei ole testattu tarpeeksi] ... Virukset muuntuvat koko ajan, Suomessakin löydettiin jo muuntunut versio koronasta, ei tällaisessa tilanteessa kannata rokottaa ... Eivät viranomaiset voi selittää tekemisiään sillä, että he tottelivat käskyjä, natsi-Saksassa tuollaiset henkilöt tuomittiin rikoksista - Googleta "Doctors' trial" ... Yhdysvalloissa 1-10'% rokotteiden haittavaikutuksista ilmoitetaan ... Totalitaristeilla on nyt kiire, koska pian tulee kesä ja auringonpaiste, joka tappaa viruksia...
Robert Steele mirror-video jolla keskustellaan DUMBeista (armeijan maanalaisista tukikohdista) ja niiden puhdistuksesta sekä tunnelilapsista: 18 FEB 2021. GENE DECODE AND HYPER DRIVE
Lin Wood Telegrammissa: I AM a happy camper. I laugh at the foolishness of the GA State Bar trying to change a lie into truth. Just like I laugh at the Fake Bribes/Obama Administration. They are both mere clown shows. Entertaining but not relevant. Both their shows will soon come to an end. And it will not end well for either one of them [...] Check my record.
Scientists entered people’s dreams and got them ‘talking’ (Science Mag)
New poll found that 73% of likely Republican voters said that leaders should be “more like” former President Trump
Empty shelves in multiple stores in Texas
Argentina health minister resigned after it emerged he had helped acquaintances cut in line to receive a COVID-19 vaccine (Toim: Miksi tuo hyvis erosi? Hänet olisi pitänyt palkita siitä, että hän on mukana pahisten eliminoinnissa. Wink, wink.)
The Simpsons predicted Ted Cruz Cancun trip back in 1993
Tiihonen twiittasi: Kuulin luotettavasta lähteestä tiedon, että eräässä terveydenhuollon yksikössä on rokotettu vajaa 10 hoitajaa AstraZenecan rokotteella. Kaikki nyt yli 39:n asteen kuumeessa ... Tiedän asiasta tarkemminkin, mutta tieto on luottamuksellinen. Haittailmoituksia ei ehkä tehdä, koska sitä saatetaan pitää epäsopivana.
Ja: Saksassa on tehty ruumiinavauksia k-naan kuolleille. K-kuolleita todellisuudessa yksi (1) prosentti. Suomessa edes kuolinsyitä ilman ruumiinavauksia ei tiedetä, sillä @THLorg pimittää sitäkin tietoa: Fast alle Corona-Toten waren vorerkrankt
Ja: Tässä The great recall lakimiesten kokous toissapäivältä. Kohdassa 12min näytetään video mistä näkyy miten saksalaisessa hoivakodissa vanhuksia rokotetaan vastoin tahtoaan. Tämän jälkeen nämä ilmiantajat ovat kertoneet että vanhuksia on kuollut reippaasti: Sondersitzung: The Great Recall - International (Min. 28 kerrotaan, että he ovat haastamassa "Saksan Ylen" oikeuteen, koska se ei ole julkaissut "oikeita uutisia" koronaan liittyen. Koska sama tehdään Suomessa?)
Paljon hyviä uutisia Parkesilta: 18th February Update Current News (Aiheina mm.: Englannissa ajetaan lainsäädäntöä henkilöllisyystodistuksen vaatimiseksi äänestäjiltä; uusi rahajärjestelmä, joka on kvanttijärjestelmä tulee pian; multimiljardöörit ovat alkaneet sijoittaa kultaan, ym. joiden he uskovat olevan arvokkaita kun uusi järjestelmä tulee; medbeds tulevat mahdollisesti tänä vuonna, ensiksi "tunnelilapsille" joita tullaan vapauttamaan valtavat määrät tänä vuonna; disclosure odotettavissa; Yhdysvaltojen viranomaiset myönsivät ensimmäistä kertaa että he ovat tutkineet maahan pudonneita avaruusaluksia)
"When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is, all things being particles of a real and rhythmic whole. We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do his will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone. A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket."
2018: Raskasmetalleja löytyi Nestlenkin (Gerber-nimellä) vauvanruuista - Lyijy laskee älykkyysosamäärää - Kuka hyötyy: Heavy Metals in Baby Food: What You Need to Know "Those with high childhood lead readings had IQ levels 4.25 points lower" (Toim: Neurologi RUSSELL BLAYLOCK sanoi muutama vuosi sitten: "Agressiivisella rokotusohjelmalla tehdään lapsista tyhmiä." Rokotteet aiheuttavat tulehdustilan aivoissa. Tuo tulehdustila ei ehdi "parantumaan" kun seuraava rokote jo annetaan. > Jatkuva tulehdustila. Aiheesta tässä)
According to National Pulse, VP Kamala Harris is taking calls with foreign leaders on behalf of President Biden. She recently talked to France's Macron and Canada's Trudeau on phone.
Elon Musk confirms ‘there will definitely be a MarsCoin’
Massive eruption of Mount Etna: Large streams of red hot lava shoot into the sky
Visitors to Manhattan federal court and other buildings in the Southern District of New York are now required to wear two face masks.
China overtakes US as European Union's main trading partner.
Huge protest (now riots) in Barcelona against the imprisonment of Pablo Hasel, a rapper jailed for his lyrics against the Spanish monarchy.
Majority of GOP voters still favor Trump for Presidential candidate in 2024
Former President Trump blasts McConnel in a new statement: “Mitch is a dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack, and if Republican Senators are going to stay with him, they will not win again...”
Biden’s Sec of State Blinken to NPR: “I think that the President Trump was right to take a tougher line on some of the egregious things that China has done and is doing that are counter to our interests and counter to our values.”
Planned Parenthoodin perustaja halusi tappaa kaikki neekerit (kirje vuodelta 1939):
Miksi ilmaston lämpeneminen tekee tällaisia kepposia: Nearly half of Texas' installed wind power generation capacity has been offline because of frozen wind turbines in West Texas, according to Texas grid operators.
Tesla "keksi" langattoman energiansiirron jo noin 100 vuotta sitten, mutta öljymiljardööri Rockefeller, joka oli jo tuolloin sijoittanut kuparikaivoksiin, "salasi" teknologian
Malinen: People are buying apartments like crazy in #Finland . I'd like to remind all that the risk of a banking crisis has not gone anywhere. Debt moratoriums and excessive central bank meddling have just made the near-inevitable crisis worse
IL: Vastaamon asiakkaan tietoja on lokimerkintöjen mukaan avattu lukuisia kertoja hänen hoitosuhteensa jälkeen, vaikka lupaa ei ole ollut.
Tiihonen Twatterissä: THL:n toiminta alkaa vaikuttaa epätoivoiselta kun löydöksien määrää halutaan lisätä. Nyt kaikki vilkutetut ohjataan testeihin. Tähän asti on monelta suunnalta selitelty, ettei oireettomia paljoa testata ... esimerkiksi Espoossa ohjataan satoja oireettomia viikossa testeihin
Malinen Twatterissä: Näin puhuu federalisti. Huomatkaa lopun epätoivo. Jos noudatamme EU:n perussopimuksen alkuperäistä tulkintaa ja perustuslakiamme, joudumme ilmeisesti eroamaan EU:sta? Just. Siinä on federalistien viimeinen puolustuslinja: pimeä pelottelu. (Malinen viittaa tähän: Elina Lepomäki: Elpymisväline: menikö yhteisvastuun juna jo?)
Hyvää äitienpäivää norjalaisille äideille! (Tänään on Norjassa kolme syytä juhlia: äitienpäivä, joka on joskus "siirretty pois itsenäisyyspäivän" läheltä, ystävänpäivä ja laskiainen) Ja hyvää ystävänpäivää kaikille!
Juho (ja minä) suosittelee Kristallipuolueeseen liittymistä (sivusto tässä). Myös Jarmo Ekman kuuluu Kristallipuolueeseen. Juho sanoo videolla (48:40>): "Miksi et allekirjottaisi kannattajakorttia? Se antaa sinulle mahdollisuuden vaikuttaa, se ei sido sinua mihinkään, se ei näy mihinkään."
Julians Rum: The core goal of mass COVID vaccination: formally identify and codify the awakened population to confine us away from the sleeping masses. Think Twitter purge but in the real world:
The Purpose of The Great Reset:
Vernon Coleman työskenteli lääkärinä Englannissa 10 vuotta, kunnes järjestelmä tuhosi hänen uransa. Tässä muutama hänen videonsa ja kirjoituksensa:
"Terveyspassi" huolettaa myös Highwirea: “SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS” (10:25) "World Economic Forum says they want to use the coronavirus to completely redifine the worlds economies" (heidän sivustoltaan hakusanalla great reset - lisää aiheesta myös omalla etusivullani)
Hautausurakoitsijan kysymys viranomaisille: Hän ole törmännyt työssään yhteenkään Covid-kuolemaan, mutta rokotekuolemiin (?) kylläkin (Kirjeet 11/2 uutisissa tässä)
TV7: Koronarajoitukset Vieraina yleiskirurgian, traumatologian ja ortopedian erikoislääkäri Ville-Veikko Elomaa, solubiologian dosentti Pirta Hotulainen sekä kansalaisaktivisti ja yrittäjä Ossi Tiihonen
Olipa kerran turvallinen Helsinki: Twitteristä: Halusin ensimmäistä kertaa käydä Kontulassa maistaakseen 4€ pitsaa kolmella täytteellä. 5 minuutin kävelyn jälkeen otin puhelimen esille ja pakoitettiin luovuttamaan puhelin tai maksaa 20€ maahanmuuttajataustaiselle. Näillä alueilla ei kuulema saa kuvata ostaria
TW: VAALIVILPPI SUOMESSA: Ballot Stuffing, "Ääniä voi tehtailla seuraavaan aamuun saakka". Kannattaa katsoa tämä pätkä (https://areena.yle.fi/26-52575), joka kertoo, miten helposti Suomessa lisätään ääniä uurniin joillekin ehdokkaille, eli tulos väärennetään
TW: #Macron, joka hakkasi #keltaliivit:jä hengiltä kuukausitolkulla Ranskassa, on huolissaan Venäjän miekkarioikeudesta? Ja #Sale, joka tuhosi #IljaJanitskin'in suree #Navalnyi'ta? MTV: Presidentti Niinistö ja Ranskan presidentti Macron jakoivat huolen Venäjästä
TW: Silminnäkijöiden mukaan he puhuivat suomea aksentilla ja olivat taustaltaan lähi-idän tai Afrikan suunnalta tulleita. Helsingssä puukotettiin 15-vuotiasta, poliisi ei ole saanut yhtään vihjettä – paikalla jopa 200 nuorta, joista kukaan ei puhu: Poliisi: Alaikäistä puukotettiin hengenvaarallisesti Helsingin Alppipuistossa, mutta kukaan ei tunnu nähneen mitään – ”Nyt olisi aika kertoa”
Almost 200 British academics are being investigated on suspicion of unwittingly helping the Chinese government build weapons of mass destruction (The Times UK)
Hacker accessed water treatment facility in Oldsmar, Florida, and raised chemicals (concentrations of Sodium Hydroxide) to "dangerous levels," Sheriff says
"Pahikset" käyttävät vanhoja valokuvia Bidenista. Biden kirkossa:
JuliansRum Boostasi:President Trumpin vanhempi neuvonantaja, Jason Miller, antaa vinkkejä tulevasta (Trump työstää juuri nyt "omaa someaan"):
"Anyone who knows President Trump - he doesn't lay low for very long. I would expect that we'll see the President reemerge on social media, and whether that's joining an existing platform or CREATING HIS NEW PLATFORM - there are a number of different options...All options are on the table. A number of things are being discussed. Stay tuned...because you know he's going to be back on social media."
Jos epäilet Lin Woodin rehellisyyttä hänen "vaalikäyttäytymisensä" suhteen (valtamedia syyttää häntä vaalivilpistä), perehdy aiheeseen hänen Telegrammissaan. Alla hänen vastauksensa Breitbartin toimittajalle (Breitbartia on pidettu "Truther-mediana", mutta kuten kaikki ymmärtävät, melkein jokaisella on hintansa/rajansa. Lahjonta/kiristäminen hyvin usein tehoaa):
Oma kommenttini edelliseen: Lin Wood, monen muun "julkkiksen" tavoin, on tuonut julki todisteita eri päättäjien osallistumisesta 2020 vaalipetokseen. Yksi noista "Woodin paljastamista" mädistä päättäjistä on Georgian "osavaltiosihteeri" Raffensperger. Georgiaa pidetään ymmärtääkseni yhtenä Yhdysvaltojen mädimmistä osavaltioista. Raffensperger luonnollisesti haluaa "kostaa" Woodin isänmaallisen teon mustamaalaamalla Woodin. Globalistinen valtamedia mustamaalaa mielellään kaikki isänmaalliset toimijat.
Muutamassa päivässä miljoonat katsoneet: Absolute Proof Please share with everyone you know to save our country! (Löytyy myös mm. Rumblesta ja Tokentubesta. Monet alustat poistavat sen.)
South Africa will suspend use of AstraZeneca's COVID-19 shot in its vaccination programme after data showed it gave minimal protection against mild to moderate infection caused by the country's dominant coronavirus variant. (Reuters)
Authorities in Haiti prevented a coup attempt and an attempt to assassinate President Jovene Moise. Official sources said 23 people were arrested, including a magistrate and a police officer. Citizens have come out to protest.
Facebook is cracking down on anti-vaxxers, says it will take tougher action during the pandemic against claims that vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccination, are not effective or safe.
Parkes: 6th February Update Current News - Otteita: ”Maailman rikkain mies” (”CIA:n Amazon.com:in omistaja”) Jeff Bezos ”jäi eläkkeelle” pystyäkseen tekemään enemmän ”hyväntekeväisyyttä” … Vain armeija saa hänenlaisensa miehen ”eläköitymään” … Hänen on täytynyt tietää, että yhtä ”hänen” studioistaan käytetään Bidenin (mm. Valkoisen talon) esiintymisten filmaamiseen … Asemansa vuoksi Flynn ei voinut muuta kuin sanoa ettei armeija tällä hetkellä johda Yhdysvaltoja … Olin yhdessä keskusteluohjelmassa astronautti Edgar Mitchellin kanssa, ja haastattelja meni ja kysyi häneltä: ”Kun olitte kuussa, näittekö avaruusolentoja?” Hänen ei olisi pitänyt saattaa Mitchelliä tuohon tilanteeseen, jossa hän (vaitiolovelvollisuutensa vuoksi) ei voinut vastata oikein mitään ... [kohdassa 16:00] Ghislaine Maxwell on kertonut viranomaisille todella paljon, ja monen tärkeän paikan sijainti, joissa mm. pidetään ihmisiä vankeina, on annettu armeijan erikoisjoukoille, ja he ovat nyt ”puhdistamassa noita maanalaisia paikkoja” … On paljon uskottavia todisteita siitä, että montaa ihmistä on syytetty, ja että heidät on sen jälkeen vapautettu … Miksi he vielä pelaavat tätä peliä? Heillä [pahiksilla] ei ole mitään paikkaa mihin mennä, mihin heitä eivät viranomaiset seuraisi. He voivat tehdä vain sen mitä he osaavat ja mihin heidät on ”luotu”: ”näytellä loppuun asti” … Sen jatkuvasti kuullun ”luota suunnitelmaan” sanonnan sijaan meitä pitäisi pyytää luottamaan armeijaan … [sotastrategisista syistä] Trump aina antoi aina väärän päivämäärän medialle armeijan joukkojen ”liikkeistä”, ja tässähän on kyse eräänlaisesta sodasta … Yhdysvallat on niin mätä … Trump on yhä presidentti, koska ei siviiliä voi syyttää virkarikoksesta."
[Anti-Trumper] Republican Staffer Arrested for Running Pedophile Ring "Babies being raped" Ruben A. Verastigui, is currently Communications Manager at Citizens For Responsible Energy Solutions (Toim: Anti-Trumper-viher-pedo?)
Hunter Biden memoir listed ‘#1 Best Seller’ under ‘Chinese Biographies’ on Amazon.
Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds' announcements.
- ENDS MASK MANDATE
- NO LIMITS ON PUBLIC GATHERINGS
- NO LIMITS OF PEOPLE IN BARS
Starting Sunday.
Fox News cancels longtime host Lou Dobbs' show ... Trump issues statement on Lous Dobbs: “Lou Dobbs is and was great. Nobody loves America more than Lou.
Trump aktivoitui(?) tänään gabissä (Julians Rum: If that’s really POTUS that posted to Gab, be sure to say another round of prayers for Gab’s servers.)
WSJ: The House Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy has released a report concluding that high levels of toxic metals including arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury are found in several top baby food brands. The 4 baby food companies include: Gerber, Beech-Nut Company, Nurture, Inc, Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Tornion korkeat Covid-luvut johtuvat mm. PCR-huijauksesta ja siitä, että mamujen Covid-positiiviset kirjataan Tornioon: THL: Koronavirustapausten tilastointi: "Jos henkilö ei ole kirjoilla Suomessa, eli väestötietojärjestelmässä ei ole tietoa hänen asuinkunnastaan, koronatapaus kirjautuu hoitopaikan sijaintikuntaan. Jos hoitopaikka ei ole tiedossa, tapaus kirjautuu ilmoittavan laboratorion sijaintikuntaan."
Lin Wood Telegrammissa juuri äsken (koskee myös sinua/Suomea):
Mitan saada vapautemme takaisin laillisesti:
Pray, pray, pray. Pray Psalms 35, 37, 140-145.
Tell your friends who think the election was legal to go get a mental health examination. They are the ones who are crazy or willfully ignorant.
Call a Communist a Communist. Do not be intimidated - exercise your free speech to the maximum extent allowed by law.
Make sure you do not buy anything made in China. When you a find a cell phone made in America, throw away your iPhone. In the meantime, do not spend a dime with Apple, Google, Amazon, Walmart, or other major companies who do business with the enemy. Cut off their money. Boycott them.
Write members of the military and tell them you love the fact that they will never dishonor their oath to defend the Constitution, freedom, and the People.
Injustice inflicted on one is injustice inflicted on all. Stand up for your fellow Patriots. If one is being mistreated or harassed for their belief in freedom and support of President Trump, flood the enemy with emails and voice mails with words supporting your fellow Patriot and decrying injustice. Stand up for your fellow Patriots. Let your voice be heard over and over again.
Turn off your television. Do NOT watch any mainstream media. None of their movies, comedies, game shows, or other meaningful mind junk.
Read books that tell you how to effectively battle Communism and lawfully resist a color revolution.
Don’t be afraid to wear a MAGA cap. The enemy is scared to death of them.
Consider selling your stocks before the enemy intentionally crashes the market to steal your money. 401(k)’s are worth $0 under communism. Buy precious metals and land.
Muista tämä: Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS.
Oma sivustoni: totuusrokotteista.fi
Insider Paper: China Has Stolen 80% Of American Adults’ Personal Data, according to former director of the US National Counterintelligence and Security Center on CBS’s 60 minutes
Tarvitsemmeko Trumpeja?
Kuvittele 500:n työntekijän organisaatio, jossa:
29 have been accused of spousal abuse
7 have been arrested for fraud
19 have been accused of writing bad checks
117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
3 have done time for assault
71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
8 have been arrested for shoplifting
21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year...
Mikä organisaatio? Yhdysvaltojen kongressi jossa 535 jäsentä.
What’s the difference between the denial of free speech in China and the US? In China, it’s directed by the CCP. In the US, Big Tech and Big Media does it for the Democrat party. Same result
Toim: Totuus lääketieteellisistä julkaisuista on se, että ne valitettavan usein eivät ole muuta kuin kokoelma teollisuuden rahoittamia viihdelehtiä.
Aiemmin arvostusta nauttineenThe New England Journal of Medicine -julkaisun päätoimittajana yli 20 vuotta toiminut Marcia Angell sanoo kirjassa Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption. (Lääkevalmistajat ja lääkärit: Tarina korruptiosta) :
"Enää ei yksinkertaisesti voi uskoa suureen osaan julkaistuista kliinisistä tutkimuksista, tai luottaa luotettavina pidettyjen lääkäreiden arviointikykyyn tai edes lääketieteen arvoihin.
Tulin tähän johtopäätökseen pikkuhiljaa noiden yli 20 vuoden aikana, kun toimin päätoimittajana The New England Journal of Medicine -julkaisussa. Ja se tekee minut hyvin surulliseksi."
Vorhies Twatterissä: Dear everyone - why are we going to Telegram? It's a messenger service 1st and the social media features were bolted... on poorly. It also just used 15GB of my phone storage. Gab is the drop in replacement for Twitter. The avoidance of Gab makes NO sense to me.
Joko ollaan 2 prosentissa: VAERS COVID REPORTS 9,872 Reports Through January 22, 2021 (Toim: Yleisesti ollaan sitä mieltä, että rokotteiden haittavaikutuksista Yhdysvalloissa raportoidaan vain 1%. totuusrokotteista.fi )
29.1.2021:
Satanistit ja lääkefirmat kiittävät: Biden Lifts Ban on US Funding for Foreign Pro-Abortion Nonprofits
Parkes: 28th January Update - Kiina haluaa Iranin aloittavan sodan Israelia vastaan, että Kiina pystyisi ”sillä välin” (ja ”huomaamatta”) ottamaan haltuun Taiwanin ... Jos tuon sodan uhka kohoaa tarpeeksi, on hyvisten pakko reagoida [The Great Awakiningillä]
Tiihonen: Sain tiedon eräästä sairaalasta: Toiset annokset Pfizer-Biontechin rokotetta ovat nostaneet yli 50% rokotetuista työntekijöistä korkean, yli 40 asteen kuumeen
Maskeista aivovaurioita lapsille? "Neurologi Margarite Griesz-Brisson varoittaa, että kasvosuojat, joita lapsia vaaditaan käyttämään koulupäivät, voivat johtaa hapen puutteeseen ja vakaviin aivovaurioihin"
Voiko tarina tunnelilapsista ja heidän pelastusoperaatioistaan olla vain yksi psy-op lisää? 24 vuotta armeijan erikoisoperaatioissa työskennellyt, "tunnelisotaan erikoistunut" sotilas on sitä mieltä. Sidney Powell postasi artikkelin: The Democrat Gaslight Express
Who can we trust? Disloyalty seems to be somewhat rampant. Personal and other hidden agendas are at work.
Complicating our search is the tactic of photoshopping. Photos are skillfully altered or created to display a “false reality.”
You should also research and learn about “deep fakes.” In simple terms, a deep fake is a method to create videos that display a false reality.
I believe these media tactics are being used at present to create confusion, blur the line between truth and lie, and advance agendas of nefarious third party actors inside and outside of our country.
I recommend that you do some homework on deep fakes.
Italy's PM Giuseppe Conte resigns as his coalition collapses
Netherlands riots: Parked car explosion recorded in a shocking video in Dan Bosch city ('s-Hertogenbosch)
LOOTING HAS STARTED, SITUATION IS OUT OF CONTROL IN ROTTERDAM, NETHERLANDS - IT ALL STARTED AFTER PEOPLE PROTESTED AGAINST GOVT'S CORONAVIRUS LOCKDOWN RULES
Coronavirus anti lockdown rioters have gone out of control, a group of rioters have blown an entire bridge in #Amsterdam, #Netherlands
Malinen: Arvoisa hallitus (ja eduskunta). Voin kertoa jo näin etukäteen, että tulen rikkomaan mahdollista ulkonaliikkumiskieltoa sekä muitakin liioiteltuja rajoituksia. Ihan vain tiedoksi, jos haluatte tulla poimimaan talteen jo etukäteen!
Parkes: 25th January Update "Yhdysvaltojen armeija tukee vahvasti presidentti Trumpia ja hyviä ihmisiä ... Biden on ensimmäinen presidentti, jolle armeija ei ole tarjonnut lentokonetta inauguraatioon lentämistä varten ... hän on ensimmäinen presidentti jolle armeija on [kirjaimellisesti] kääntänyt selkänsä ... kaikki tämä löytyy netistä ... armeijan seuraava isku tulee yllätyksenä, kansaa ei ehkä varoiteta ennakkoon"
Laura Huhtasaari "Valtakunnansyyttäjän mukaan osassa viestejä kyse ei ole kiihottamisrikoksesta, koska ne eivät kohdistu rangaistussäännöksessä tarkoitettuun kansanryhmään." - Onko homot kansanryhmä?
Insider Paper: Inspector General of US Justice Department has launched investigation into whether any current or former department officials engaged in an improper attempt to alter the election 2020 results.
Praying Medic: The Military Is the Only Way – What Happens Next? "Good people in the military and intelligence community were backing Donald Trump as a presidential candidate ... The military had recruited Donald Trump to run for President. Trump later confirmed that claim."
Search giant Google is converting its facilities into COVID-19 vaccination sites starting in New York City, Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area and Kirkland, Washington
Dr Fauci says, there is risk that the existing vaccines might not fight future variants.
Jos haluat todisteita inauguraation feikkauksesta, katso ihmisten kenkiä puolessa välissä seremoniaa
Trump sääti asetuksia hätätilasta armeijalle, ja vain armeija voi peruuttaa ne, ei Biden.
Pentagon ei tunnusta Bidenin presidenttiyttä
Trump säätää yhä asetuksia
Biden ei ole säätänyt väitettyä 14:ää asetusta, jos on, ne ovat vielä hänen pöydällään
Valkoinen talo on tällä hetkellä Mar de Lagossa
Biden filmattiin ja CGI:t tehtiin studiossa, koska he tiesivät että Biden oli pulassa eikä hän voisi mennä oikeaan tilaisuuteen. Mutta jotain tapahtui muutamaa tuntia ennen inauguraatiota, ja Biden, Obama ja muut saivat varmuuden siitä ettei heitä pidätettäisi siellä
Suunnitelma oli pidättää Biden joukkoineen inauguraatiossa [josta osa oli ”filmattu” etukäteen], mutta sitten jotain tapahtui, ja se peruttiin viime hetkellä
Trumpin takana on 800 vanhempaa upseeria, aina kenraaleihin asti, jotka ehdottomasti tukevat häntä eivätkä halua olla missään tekemisissä Bidenin kanssa.
Washingtonissa on nyt kaksi hallitusta, ”siviili” ja ”armeija”. Pentagon on kieltäytynyt antamasta joitain tietoja Bidenille, eikä hän ole tervetullut sinne. Armeijaa ”komentavat” nyt FEMA-vastaava (?) sekä ”puolustusministeri” Miller. Vaikka Biden antaisi heille ”potkut”, he olisivat silti armeijan johdossa.
Nämä pahikset eivät ole tavallisia gangstereita, joilla on kunniakoodi. He ovat saatanallisia kabaaligangstereita jotka eivät kunnioita mitään.
Hyvikset jatkavat työtään [ja seuraava ”yritys” tullaan näkemään mahdollisesti maalis-huhtikuussa] , mutta sota ei lopu ennen kuin Biden [joukkoineen] on lyöty.
Trump sanoi, että hän palaa vielä. Hän saattaa palata 19. presidenttinä (”aikaan” jolloin USA ei ollut vielä yhtiö).
21.1.2021:
Are we watching a movie?
Olin eilen sitä mieltä, että virkaanastujaiset saattavat olla toteutetut GCI-tekniikalla and "By Hollywood"
Charlie Ward sai tuon nauhan käsiinsä tunteja ennen "suoraa lähetystä". Eli koko tilaisuus oli etukäteen nauhoitettu farssi.
Malinen: Tiedoksi. Tätä [keskustelutilaisuutta] yritetään järjestää uudelleen helmikuuksi, kun nyt ei pääministeri @MarinSanna tai muille hallituksen jäsenille käynyt. Hallituksen ON selitettävä suomalaisille, miksi he ovat meitä EU:n rahastoon viemässä!
Yksi teoria tapahtumista:
Valkoisen talon YT-kanavalla jengi alapeukuttaa Bidenin videoita:
Sotilasvallankaappaus jonka jälkeen kansalle aletaan selittää/näyttää pahisten kepposia
Jos edelliset ennustukseni (kaikki/suuri osa) menevät metsään, on arvioitava tilanne uudelleen
Joka tapauksessa, PYSY RAUHALLISENA ja anna viranomaisten (ja armeijan) tehdä työnsä. 95% heistä on hyviksiä.
12:19: Tarinoihin Kiinan invaasiosta en uskoisi, vaikka Kiinalla mahdollisesti onkin satojatuhansia sotilaita valmiudessa USAn rajoilla. Jenkit eivät ole tyhmiä.
Jordan Sather eilen: Final minute moves:
- DECLAS of documents, much related to SpyGate
- Unsealing of documents in the Ghislaine Maxwell case
- 150 pardons coming
- Biden oddly cries his eyes out
- Trump drops a "farewell" video, only references a "new administration" being next, doesn't mention Biden's name once
- Key R's not going to Trump's farewell send off but going to inauguration (even Trump's own VP)
- Gina Haspel steps down from CIA Director
- Chris Miller installs patriot as NSA's top lawyer
- MSM/FBI cronies desperate to "vet" the National Guard troops
- WaPo desperate to discredit Q with "FBI Intelligence briefing" bullshit story
- Biden DNI pick desperate to discredit Q at confirmation hearings
VARMISTAMATON aikataulu Bidenille tälle päivälle:
1:
2:
Gab: 65,000 Troops In Service, According to Chief of the National Guard
TW: #Iltalehti on julkaissut alle vuorokaudessa jo kolme #Bidenia palvovaa artikkelia. Tässähän mennään Marin-hehkutuksenkin ohi!
Totuuden etsijöiden "virkaanastumisvalvojaiset" (mm?) Zoomissa alkaa hyvissä ajoin ennen kello 18.00.
Jeffrey Epstein arranged for the adoption of Roberts’ children.
Pence is on videos captured by FBI. Discussions about murdering judges. Roberts was involved. So was Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton thought she had rigged the 2016 election. The plan after her election was to kill federal judges so that Hillary could stack the judiciary. US Supreme Court targeted. FBI was complicit.
Justice Scalia learned of the plan to kill members of the judiciary. He reported it to the White House. Shortly thereafter, Justice Scalia was murdered
I have previously provided the entire interview of the whistleblower [who has the evidence of above mentioned crimes] to agents of the U.S. Secret Service.
Vice President Pence is considering resigning today.
Chief Justice Roberts - Classic induction into elite globalist organisations - Sold his children into their management. Jeffrey Epstein acted as middle man.
A number of the President's Team posting on Telegram have had their accounts hacked.
Military task force takes up position just a few miles off the California coast.
US cuts line to Chinese and Russian embassies in a number of cities. I don’t know if this means that the US can’t talk to them in a diplomatic way - Or if the embassies are not able to make calls out.
Parkes: 18TH JANUARY UPDATE CURRENT NEWS "Trumpin hallinnossa 75% oli häntä vastaan ... Hän odottaa viimeiseen asti saadakseen mahdollisimman monen sleeperin paljastamaan itsensä ... tulossa on mielenkiintoisia asioita, joista voimme keskustella, jos meillä on netti ... tiesitkö että Bidenin tiimi haluaa uudelleenkirjoittaa perustuslain ensimmäisten 100:n päivän aikana?"
22:44: Lin Wood juuri äsken Telegrammissa: Over the weekend, 50,000 restaurants in Italy opened in a mass civil disobedience demonstration, despite lockdown restrictions. WE NEED THIS WORLDWIDE!
X22 with Praying Medic: Dave Hayes - Red Lines Crossed, Actions Taken, Military Operation Now In Focus Otteita: En ole ”postannut” mitään, koska en tiedä mitä tulee tapahtumaan … Jos Biden astuu virkaan 20. päivä, meidän täytyy analysoida tilanne uudestaan … Yhdysvaltain puolustushaarakomentajien neuvosto julkaisi kirjeen muutama päivä sitten, jossa he ilmoittivat aikovansa tehdä yhteistyötä ”presidentti Bidenin hallinnon kanssa. Mutta hehän eivät päätä asioista. Asioista päättää puolustusministeri Miller … Jos olisin Trump julistaisin sotatilan D.C:hen jolloin hän voisi jo siellä olevien 10 tuhannen sotilaan vavulla pidättää D.C.:n diipparit
Lue twitterketju: Biden’s transition team has revealed there is a very real fear that members of the national guard who support President Trump might kill Biden during the inauguration so they’ve asked commanders to confiscate all ammo and magazines from the soldiers. See photo...
Norjassa RAPORTOITU 23 "Covidrokotekuolemaa"- 25.000 ihmistä rokotettu (Toim: Kuinka monta raportoimatta? Yhdysvalloissa asiantuntijat ovat aiemmin arvioineet, että haittavaikutuksista raportoidaan 1%. Nyt tilanne on varmasti toinen, mutta silti. Oma sivustoni: totuusrokotteista.fi)
21:00: Juuri nyt livenä: PANIC IN DC! - Yhdysvaltojen tilanne 14.1.2021 klo 21 "Q kirjaimen leffan käsikirjoitus on vuotanut nettiin! Totuuden Etsijät spoilaa leffan lopputuloksen ja käy läpi yksityiskohtia." (Voit osallistua myös Zoomiin, sinne pääset esim. fasen yksityisten kuu-ryhmien kautta)
Project Veritas paljastaa korruptiota mm. salakuvaamalla päättäjiä. Project Veritasin ansiosta presidentinvaaleissa "kymmeniä tuhansia" ääniä ostanut/myynyt rikollinen pidätettiin juuri:
James O'Keefe: "For those in the media who say there is no such thing as voter fraud & that @project_veritas is trying to “undermine the election” like @schwartzbCNBC , TAKE A SEAT! YOU’VE DONE NOTHING! You do nothing but punditry and attack those who actually do the job!"
Maria Zack oli tiiminsä kanssa Italiassa keräämässä todistuaineistoa vuoden 2020 Yhdysvaltojen presidentinvaalien vaalivilpistä. "Italygatessa" ovat olleet mukana mm. usean eri maan tiedustelupalvelut sekä noiden maiden poliittista johtoa. Myös Vatikaanin (ja Vatikaanin tiedustelupalvelun) epäillään olleen mukana. Maria Zach tapasi Trumpin jouluaattona, ja kertoi hänelle kattavasta todistusaineistosta. Obama "maksoi Italygaten" mm. Iranista saamillaan 400 miljoonalla dollarilla.
Parkes: 12th January Update Current News "There's a Q and there are Anons" Parkes mm. selittää Q:ta; 2016 70% hallituksesta olisi täytynyt pidättää; [monilla poliitikoilla] on miljoonia vatikaanin pankissa; JFK tapettiin koska hän kävi fedin kimppuun
"We simply cannot stay closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The cost is too high. We will have nothing left to open. We must reopen the economy, but we must do it smartly and safely"
8kun-Ron: Hearing that Parler's database has been compromised. What is being reported as leaked:
Every deleted message. Every image. Every video. Private messages. Identifications. Names. Some location data.
Facebook has shut a slew of accounts belonging to Ugandan government officials "accused of seeking to manipulate public debate ahead of elections Thursday" (AFP).
Malinen uudelleentwiittasi: “Cumulus Media, which employs some of the most popular right-leaning talk-radio hosts in the United States, has told its on-air personalities to stop suggesting that the election was stolen from President Donald Trump - or else face termination.”
13:41: Gab pelittää juuri nyt (kuten joten), Parler ei.
10:13: Parler ja Gab molemmat kovilla. Gab onneksi pelittää juuri nyt, Parler ei.
TW (Lähde varmentamatta): What we know:
Blackouts in Italy, Germany, Pakistan & Texas
US military on ground in DC, Canada border & WA
Capital & other Gvt buildings in DC fenced in
Large no fly zone over DC
Multiple large portable generators & cell towers set up in DC
FCC completed EBS test
BM uud.twiittasi (video): Denmark Anti Lockdown Protest. Epic crowds. This is the only thing that can stop this now, pure, raw people power. This is what they fear, UNITY
TW: BLM capitolin mellakoija tallustelee vapaana. Ei se niin vakavaa ollutkaan kuin mediat yle ja husari väitti
Tiihonen: [Lääkäri Ville-Veikko Elomaan ] Koronadystopia-kirjoitus hävisi US Puheenvuorosta @uusisuomi alle vuorokaudessa - Huuskokin heräsi ma-aamuun kommunistin sensuurisormi virkeänä! Kirjoitus löytyy täältä (web.archive tässä)
10.1.2021:
Moni luottolähde: The President has signed the Insurrection act as of last night. (Nyt armeija voi ottaa pahiksia vangiksi ilman tuomioistuinten käyttöä sekä aloittaa oikeudenkäynnit)
Lin Wood postasi tämän Pelosin kirjeen Portlandin kaupunginjohtajalle (mellakoiden aikoihin): Syytä Trumpia, Valtamedia tukee kaikke sanomaasi:
Monet luotettavat lähteet ovat kertoneet että Italiassa, josta käsin 2020 vaalivilppi "koordinoitiin", valtamedia on julkaissut aiheesta runsaasti artikkeleja jo pari-kolme viikkoa. Voisiko joku italiankielentaitoinen lukijani pöyhia aihetta ja lähettää minulle materiaalia/ linkkejä tai julkaista tietoa "tilanteesta Italiassa" itse?
Covidkäyrät on saatava nousuun: BBC: Covid-19: Rapid tests for asymptomatic people to be rolled out
Lin Wood in Parler @linwood: Apple is going to do an update on all phones to shut off the emergency broadcast system...Turn your auto update toggle off.
iPhone on siis mukana Trumpin (totuuden) bannaamisessa (ja muut kännykkävalmistajat ovat todennäköisesti samassa junassa)
Nyt on sopiva hetki kaivaa laatikosta esiin se vaaaaaanha kännykkä ja laittaa siihen vaikka vaan prepaid-liittymä. Laturiin kiinni ja pöydälle.
Platforms banning or restricting Trump:
Tiihonen: Löytyyköhän Suomesta ketään avoimin silmin kulkevaa asiantuntijaa kertomaan, onko ao. juttu 1. mahdollinen 2. kuinka todennäköinen? Tähän mennessä saamani tiedot ja kommentit kertovat, että on mahdollinen: Miksi jotkut kuolevat mRNA-rokotteen ottamisen jälkeen?
Sather: Amazon Is Booting Parler Off Of Its Web Hosting Service "Because Parler cannot comply with our terms of service and poses a very real risk to public safety, we plan to suspend Parler’s account effective Sunday, January 10th, at 11:59PM PST."
Gab: Silicon Valley should see our inbox right now. Looks like half of their employees want to leave and come work for Gab. ("viestiiikenne" +400%)
And: President Trump attempts to post Tweets from his official government account @POTUS after his personal account @realDonaldTrump was suspended. Twitter immediately removed those tweets.
Amy Peikoff, responsible for policy on #Parler, just said on the Tucker Carlson show, if their internet hosting provider takes down the servers, it's the end of the platform.
Sidney Powell parlasi: President Trump should act now to open Hammer and Scorecard to expose China role in flipping votes in our election
Lin Wood uudelleenparlasi: ... Hitler and the SS burnt the building down but blamed it on the communist? It was done to eliminate their enemy and history is repeating itself, AOC calling for concentration camps, media calling for Trump and his family to be banded from having any voice? Don’t let MSM fool you this all is straight out of the communist and Nazis play book if we don’t wake up history is repeating itself right before our eyes
8.1.2021:
Kun Q kirjoitti "He eivät voi enää kävellä kaduilla", Q tarkoitti tätä (myös tässä)
Praying Medic videollaan eilen: Trump aikoo viettää viikonlopun Camp Davidilla (armeijan neuvonantajiensa kanssa keskustellen?); hänen "perustuslailliset keinonsa" on nyt käytetty (mutta muita vaihtoehtoja on: Pidätykset, dokumenttien julkistaminen, armeijan käyttö...); miksi Valkoisen talon ympärille "rakennetaan muuria?"
Sidney uudelleentwiittasi: NPR uutisoi kongressin valtauksesta 5 tuntia ennen kuin se tapahtui:
Just in case: sidneypowell.com
Trump twiittasi juuri: En aio olla presidentiin virkaanastujaistilaisuudessa 20. päivä. Eikö koko tilaisuutta ole tulossa? Tulee myöhemmin? Viimeinen presidentti?
Kuinka mielenosoittajat pääsivät sisään turvallisena pidettyyn rakennukseen?
Video: Kesken "kongressin valtauksen" ja yleisestä kaaoksesta huolimatta yhdellä ovella olleet poliisit juttelivat mielenosoittajien kanssa ystävällisesti, ja alkoivat sitten tulla ulos. Pääsivätkö mielenosoittajat silloin rakennuksen sisään?
Lokka Gabissa: Hesarin "hardest working teenager out here" tienasi viime vuonna 140 euroa. 2018 hän tienasi 0 euroa. Näillä tuloilla hän ostaa 2000 euron takkeja joka kuukausi
The problem with stealing an election and getting caught: Even if you make it into the White House, how do you keep 80 million people from physically removing you?
Youtube kiristää taas sensuuriaan: Due to the disturbing events that transpired yesterday, and given that the election results have now been certified, starting today *any* channels posting new videos with false claims in violation of our policies will now receive a strike
Jos jostain syystä epäilet Trust the Planiä tai muuten vaan masennuttaa, katso tämä Parkesin video (Nyt Yhdysvaltojen armeijalla on palapelin kaikki palat hallussaan, VATIKAANIA myöten): "MI6" Parkes: 7th January Update Current News
Georgian vaalivilppi toissapäivänä (jonka datan U.S. Army Parkesin mukaan tarvitsi pystyäkseen "kokoomaan palapelin"):
Oma sivuni siitä, kuinka Soros palkkaa mielenosoittajia tässä
TW: Does it seem funny to anyone else that I watched 10's (probably 100's) of thousands of people come into the rally today, and didn't see a single confederate flag... But somehow one of the "Trump Supporters" that ended up in the capital had one ready for the photo op?
Lin Wood parlasi juuri: Trump on komentokeskuksessa ja seuraa maanpettureiden tekemisiä:
Ja: Many traitors will be arrested & jailed over the next several days.
Haluatko pysyä realistina koronan ja rokotteiden uutisoinnin keskellä? Koronarealistit.com-sivusto tarjoaa kaikille hyödyllistä tietoa, jotta voit valita oman linjasi itseäsi koskettaviin päätöksiin. (Tiihonen: Hoitajia on mukana jo yli 300)
No significant proportion of GOP supports a ludicrous (and impossible given timing) round 2 impeachment or 25th Amendment action
Pence Chief of Staff banned from entering the White House. (Lue eilisistä uutisistani syy)
6:33: Kongressissa kaikki näyttää menevän siihen suuntaan että Joe Bidenista tulee presidentti, mutta peli on kesken.
Praying Medic 3:00: Anons: If you've read the drops, you know where we're headed. The road to freedom is long and the path, dark. But America is awakeneing to the truth. Our best days are yet to come--as long as we remain steadfast in our convictions and refuse to bend our knee to tyrants.
8kun-Ron: Trump needs to tell people to disperse. Since he asked people to disperse, it is possible that he could theoretically invoke the insurrection act next.
Facebook has removed President Trump’s video message to the American people.
Facebook has now banned Trump.
Pence petti kansan
Twitter poistelee Trumpin twiittejä.
Twatter blokkasi Lin Woodin (ainakin) 12 tunniksi
Objection to Arizona election results fails in the Senate.
01:00: Lin Wood uudelleentwiittasi: Former FBI agent on the ground at U.S. Capitol just texted me and confirmed that at least 1 "bus load" of Antifa thugs infiltrated peaceful Trump demonstrators as part of a false Trump flag ops
Breaking: Italia koordinoi vaalivilpin 2020! (Audio tässä)
Maria Zack, kansalaisjärjestö nationsinaction.org:in perustaja kertoo edellisellä, pari päivää sitten julkaistulla äänitteellä mm. seuraavaa:
"Italialainen Kenraali Graziano on heidän komentajansa ... Hän suunnitteli operaation ja toimii italialaisen Leonardon (maailman 8. suurimman armeijoiden alihankkijan) johtokunnassa. Tässä on kyseessä hyökkäys jossa on monta maata mukana"
"On Christmas Eve we met with President Trump and informed him that he is getting the affidavits of the people involved."
"Funding: In 2017 Barack Obama took $400 million, 14 pallets of cash, and that money was transferred over to different accounts. We have the exact travel plan of that cash."
8kun-Ron: The theft of the election was orchestrated by Stephan Serafini, a 20-year foreign service officer. Stephan coordinated with General Claudio Graziano, a board member of Leonardo. Italian intelligence provided us with documents, calls, & photos of CIA agents involved.
8kun-Ron TW: Barack Obama & The Ministry of Italy Altered Voting systems via Private Military Contractors and satellites in space
Laura Huhtasaari TW: Lait ovat tavallisia ihmisiä varten. Todella suuret rikolliset ovat lahjoneet, kiristäneet ja uhkailleet kaikki ne, jotka voisivat heidät saattaa vastuuseen. Sama pankkimaailmassa. Jos sulla on miljoona velkaa, sulla on ongelma. Jos velkaa on 100 miljardia, pankilla on ongelma.
TW: As we are driving to our hotel in DC there are police checking papers and hotel registrations. If you don’t have papers, they won’t let you through the check points.
Praying Medic twiittasi linkin: "A printing shop in Michigan prints ballots … that get diverted to New York … There, a boiler room of folks fill in "Biden" then get trucked into Pennsylvania and mailed. Hundreds of thousands. We have all of that documented"
2.1.2020 LIVE Yazkan vieraana Ossi Tiihonen Tai tässä "Tälle vuodelle on varattu yli miljardi ["turhiin"] PCR-testeihin ... Helsingin Sanomien uutiset on aivan roskaa. Mulla on blogissa varmaan kymmeniä esimerkkejä siitä, kuinka Hesari ja Yle levittää väärää tietoa (>47:00)"
Trump tw juuri: Our Republican Senate just missed the opportunity to get rid of Section 230
Lin Wood tw juuri: When arrests for treason begin, put Chief Justice John Roberts, VP Mike Pence & Mitch McConnell at top of list. (Toim: 1. Kuten Q sanoi: Väärän tiedon syöttäminen on tarpeen. Tai 2. Wau!)
Lin Woodin tuore twiitti: Before attacking me, maybe fair-minded people would first ask [SCOTUS] Roberts to tell the truth. Or ask Jeffrey Epstein. He is alive.
Tiihonen: Haluaisin kysyä nyt teiltä THLorg ja mapetti, että väärennättekö tilastoja lisää nyt kun vuodeosastoilla olevien käyrä on lähtenyt taas laskemaan?
Simon Parkes: 30TH DECEMBER UPDATE CURRENT NEWS (Selittää mm. Nashvilleä lisää, Diippareilla (?) Heathrown lentokentällä 6 valtavaa kultavarastoa - Kun maa alkaa polttaa jalkojen alla, pikku pysähdys Lontoossa ja Karipialle...)
Ehdoton katsottava! Ent. "Lääkärit" tv-ohjelman tuottajasta Del Bigtreestä tuli "rokotetrutheri". Videolla hän haastattelee todella pätevää lääkäriä/tiedemiestä, joka selittää virusten merkitystä terveydelle, "Covidhuijausta", ym. THE MOST WATCHED INTERVIEW OF 2020
Tekemäni lyhennelmä edellisestä videosta tässä (odt)
"The invisible virus is an enormous control mechanism" Catherine Austin Fitts ( United States Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing during the Presidency of George H.W. Bush) Catherine Austin Fitts | Full Interview | Planet Lockdown
Miksi poliisin johto antaa poliisin maineen rapautua? Esimerkki #452 - Taposen toiminta:
Tiina Keskimäki: #Rikosylikomisario @JariTaponen @HelsinkiPoliisi tarjoaa #JessikkaAro:lle jopa #omapoliisi palveluja esimiestensä siihen puuttumatta. Mikä erityisasema tällä daamilla on ja miksi:
Toim: Aro on tunnetusti "Ylen" entinen huumekauppias ja huumeiden käyttäjä, jota valtamedia ylistää ja suojelee kohtuuttomasti. MV-lehden haulla löytyy runsaasti todellista tietoa hänestä.
Lin Wood twiittasi: The level of evil & corruption that exists in our government & business leaders will truly shock the world when every lie is revealed. We have been groomed to believe lies are truth & truths are lies. Time to wake up.
Tiihonen on lukenut tutkimuksia: Mediassa toistuu edelleen väitteitä, ettei C-19 -virukselle olisi vastustuskykyä. Mikäli tuo pitäisi paikkansa, niin olisimme kaikki sairastuneet siitä. Tutkimukset ovat nyt varmistamassa, että noin 80:llä prosentilla on jonkinlainen vastustuskyky. (Ks. seuraava tutkimus:)
Tiihonen jatkaa: On huomattava, että T-soluimmuniteetti on osa vasta neljättä immuunipuolustuksen linjaa. Jo tätä aiemmin on immuunipuolustus torjunut suurimman osan taudinaiheuttajista.
Video 29:37: Robert David Steele Dustin Nemosin kanssa "Nashville oli todennäköisesti energia-aseella toteutettu ... Suurin huoleni tammikuun 6. mielenosoituksen suhteen on [diippareiden] radiologisen aseen käyttö tai 5G:n käyttö aseena [se aiheuttaa samat oireet kuin Covid] ... Irlannin CDC on vahvistanut ettei Covidia ole, kyse vain jostain influenssan versiosta, johon rokotteet eivät tehoa ... [Great Reset] Klaus Schwab on 'jo tuomittu kuolemaan" (A dead man walking) ... Tämän [vaali] sotkun selvittäminen saattaa kestää huhtikuuhun ja tulossa saattaa olla jopa uudet vaalit..."
Statement from the President 27.12.2020: "... I am signing this bill to restore unemployment benefits, stop evictions, provide rental assistance... a family of four would receive $5,200 ... [Senate] repeals Section 230, and starts an investigation into voter fraud."
Parkes:27th December Update Current News Parkes selittää Nashvillen AT&T rakennuksen räjähdystä (DS tuhosi ”vuosikymmenten” puhelujen nauhoitteet) ,valtamedia tullaan ajamaan alas, China-Bidenin feikit virkaanastujaiset tullaan pitämään...
Lin Wood TW eilen: It is time to shine red hot light of truth on Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, Joe Biden, Obama, Clintons, Bill Gates, VP Mike Pence, Mark Meadows, Pat Cippoloni, Bush 41 & 43, George Soros, Cocaine Mitch, etc. Man, where is Jeffrey Epstein when you need him?
Toim: Joku kysyi häneltä: Are you confident for the 6th, Mr. Wood?
Lin vastasi: I am confident that on January 20, 2021, @realDonaldTrump will be sworn in for his second term as President
TW: Gaza strip being bombed ~ 1 hour ago Absolutely 0 media coverage
Kansanedustaja Ano Turtiainen: Sitä [pienyritysten tuhoa? Kiinan kommunistpuolueen vallan kasvua?] vauhdittaa myös Suomen typeryys. Muunmuassa teennäisesti pandemiaksi paisutetun influenssan edessä jopa koko eduskunta poseeraa kiinalaiset maskit naamalla.
Maailman miljardöörit ovat tyyliin tuplanneet omaisuutensa Covidhuijauksen aikana:
Jeff Bezos reveals he gets eight hours of sleep, makes just three decisions a day and has all his important meetings in the morning.
TW: Miksi suojelemme sellaista uskontoa mikä tappaa omiemme uskontoon kuuluvia? (Nigeria tänään - kirkko poltettu, 7 ammuttu, 10 kotia poltettu, pappi kidnapattu joulunvieton aikana).
Onnea rehellisille vaaleille/kyselyille Suomessa (Scytl selitetty uutisessa kuvien alla):
Scytl partners with Tieto:
Ja kyselyt Scytl/Kantarilta
Sivuni vaalivilpistä Suomessa tässä ja Yhdysvalloissa tässä
Miten Scytl liittyy 2020 vaaleihin? (Laskivat USA:n äänet SAKSASSA) Asianajaja Lin Wood: "I guarantee you the real vote was an overwhelming landslide for Donald Trump. The servers that were seized in Frankfurt a few days ago, from a company called Scytl. Those servers show the real vote. Trump won this election with 410 Electoral votes"
Trump twiittasi eilen videon "kommunistien tavoitteista" Yhdysvalloissa. Itse julkaisin tuon "tavoitelistan" 4 vuotta sitten (tässä)
Huhtasaari: Se, joka ohjaa yleistä mielipidettä , sillä on valta. Jos on vaara, että joku pystyisi muuttamaan yleisen mielipiteen, hänet halutaan tavalla ja toisella tuhota tai ainakin saattaa naurunalaiseksi. Vaarallinen on juuri sellainen henkilö, joka puhuu asiaa: (Trutheri) Malinen: En ole koskaan kokenut tällaista halveksuntaa
Päivitys linkkeihin, koska videot olivat "vioittuneet" (23 minuutin video olikin oikeasti 1:10:51): JUKKA DAVIDSSONIN 21/12 KATSAUS NYKYTILANTEESTA. KYSYMYKSIÄ JA VASTAUKSIA (Tai Tokentubessa tässä) Aiheita: Black Nobility "eliminoitu", mätiä pressoja "eliminoitu", sulkutilojen tarkoitus on pitää kansa turvassa, pois "puhdistusoperaatioiden" jaloista...
24.12.2020:
Rauhallista joulua!
Ruoho: Viilenevää säätä, ei ilmastoa, tasan joulukuusi vuotta ;) Hyvää Joulua jokaiselle <3 aidan kaikilla puolilla:
Paavi eroaa - Vatikaani on siirtänyt (johdolta salaa) ja siirtää edelleen valtavia summia rahaa Australiaan (video 2:10): 2MOT - POPE TO RESIGN? - IPOT PRESENTS
Toim: Itse rokotteisiin hyvin perehtyneenä, minulle herää koronarokotteista kysymys mitä käytettiin plasebona (lumelääkkeenä) koronarokotetutkimuksissa. Lääkkeirtä testattaessa niiden tehoa verrataan lumelääkkeeseen (”sokerinpalanen”) . Melkein kaikissa rokotetutkimuksissa plasebona käytetään TOISTA ROKOTETTA. ei ”suolaliuosta”, niin kuin kuuluisi. Eli jos uusi rokote aiheuttaa saman verran vakavia haittavaikutuksia kuin vanhakin (siis yleensä todella paljon) on se "OK".
Koronarokotukset UK:ssa - tilanne 19/12 - haittavaikutukset ym: 3% yli 100k rokotetusta sai vakavia oireita:
Toim: Asiantuntijat pelkäävät kakkosrokotteen ( ja sitä seuraavien tehosterokotteiden) haittavaikutusten olevan huomattavasti vakavampia.
22.12.2020:
Ruotsin ulkoministeri 20/12: Ruotsin ja Tanskan välinen raja suljettiin siksi että tanskalaisten hauskanpito Ruotsin puolella loppuisi. Ruotsissahan ravintolat ja kaupat ovat normaalisti auki. Ei rajan sulkemisella ole mitään tekemistä viruksen kanssa. Ei rajojen sulkeminen ole vaikuttanut viruksen leviämiseen
Parkes: Valehteleva valtamedia lyö pian suurimman vaihteen päälle, SCOTUSit ovat "patissa", pian USA:ssa alkaa tapahtua ("pysykää kotona"): 21st December Update Current News Hänen Web-sivustonsa tässä
Parkes eilen: The reason Trump has sent all non essential staff from the White House and in other DC Federal departments home was because they would be targets in DC in the coming days as the military operation unfolds.
TOXIC DISCOVERY IN CANCELLED COVID VACCINE Australia is scrapping their $750 million #Covid19 vaccine program after several trial participants falsely tested positive for HIV... "The costly move was nothing more than a precautionary measure", a HighWire investigation has made a toxic discovery about the recently scrapped vaccine.
TW: So you are telling me that the people who wrote a bill stealing your money for Sudan, Pakistan, Burma, Nepal, Cambodia, illegal aliens, windmills, solar panels, 1908 Springfield race riots and horse performance enhancing drugs while giving you only $600 wouldn't steal your votes?
Trump on Globalismia vastaan:
Näitä "#maanpetos" riittää:
Trump TW: Two years ago, the great people of Wisconsin asked me to endorse a man named Brian Hagedorn for State Supreme Court Justice, when he was getting destroyed in the Polls against a tough Democrat Candidate who had no chance of losing. After my endorsement, Hagedorn easily won!..he just voted against me in a Big Court Decision on voter fraud...
Ja 20 miljoonaa lisää, ja 20 miljoonaa lisää...: Tier 4 restrictions could remain in place until Easter Ministers believe at least 20 million people will need to be vaccinated before any significant relaxing of Covid measures
Ja kaiken lisäksi maskit tuhoavat hampaasi (ja sitä kautta koko terveytesi):
Nigel Farage: Lontoolaiset pakenevat pois Lontoosta lockdownien alla
Ja seuraava "vaarallinen virus" iski juuri kun porukka alkoi hiffata huijauksen: AFP: Belgium is suspending flight and train arrivals from Britain from midnight (2300 GMT) Sunday after the UK detected a coronavirus variant suspected to be more infectious.
PM: The plan was the gradual implementation of Communism, while denying it. Trump forced them to admit it.
8kun-Ron: If Lin Wood is right, then SCOTUS is compromised. All cases may die on the vine. What we need is the US Marshalls to impound and inspect the voting machines. Can it be done?
Ossi Tiihonen edellisessä haastattelussa: "Ei tässä voi päätyä mihinkään muuhun johtopäätökseen, nämä faktat täytyy olla hallituksella tiedossa, ja samoin kaikilla jotka näitä kaivaa. Tässä ei voi olla mistään muusta kyse, kuin tarkoituksellisesta paniikin ja pelon luomisesta … pienyrityksiä tapetaan tuhansittain … Ei tällä tavalla tilastoja tehdä, tämä on aivan törkeä väärennös. Eli THL väärentää näitä tilastoja ja näihin perustuu suomalainen terveyspolitiikka ja rajoitukset ja AVI:n määräykset siitä, että meillä on mukamas joku epidemia"
PATOLOGIAN PROFESSORI JOHN LEE KERTOO COVIDISTA - Pfizerin Yeadon: Hän on yksi englannin parhaista patologeista.
Ote videolta:
Emme koskaan tule pääsemään ”nollacovid” tilanteeseen ... pitäisi yrittää päästä sen kanssa ”tasapainoon”, ja nykytoimet vain vaikeuttavat sitä ja aiheuttavat valtavaa tarpeetonta vahinkoa. Mustan surman aikaan hallitukset tapattivat kaikki kissat koska niiden luultiin levittävän tautia. Itse asiassa se vain pahensi asiaa, koska taudin levittäjiä olivatkin rotat, joiden määrä räjähti kun kissat tapettiin. Hallitukset eivät ymmärrä näitä asioita, niiden pitäisi odottaa kunnollisia todisteita ennen toimia. Covidiin kuolee lähinnä ihmisiä joiden elinajan odote on alhainen."
"Vaalitulos" ei ole vielä ratkennut. Voiko China-Bidenista sittenkin vielä tulla presidentti:
8kun-Ron: Hackers have allegedly gained access to the network of the agency which maintains the NUCLEAR STOCKPILE.
TW: Remember this Remember, the Snowden disclosures reported that both CIA and NSA have hacking tools that can falsely attribute an attack to a third party.
TW:A staffer "heard *SCREAMING* through the walls as Justice Roberts & other liberal Justices were insisting this case *NOT* be taken up..."
How Human Cancer Cells Got Into Vaccines 2012 FDA voted to allow the use of human fetal cells and human tumor cells in vaccines, despite acknowledging the many risks
17.12.2020:
S-posti - Haiti, Clintonit ja vaalituloksia korjaava Smartmatic:
PSYOPISTA Gabissä: We are under an incredibly sophisticated PSYOP (psychological operation) Psychological operations are operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior. It's not just Gab they are attacking, it's you....
TW: This is incredible. Two weeks before the election Twitter changed how you retweet because they obviously didn’t want certain things to go viral. Now that they got the result they want, they’re going back to the old way. Big tech is manipulating us in ways we can’t imagine. (Toim: Olin itse ajatellut jo samaa)
Project Veritas julkaisi Julian Assangen puhelinsoiton Hillaryn ulkoministeriölle, jossa Assange varoitti heitä siitä, että Wikileaksilta varastetut dokumentit (250.000) saatettaisiin julkaista lähipäivinä, saattaen henkilöitä (agentteja) vaaraan:
Erikoislääkäri Rauli Mäkelä koronarokotteista:Kuinka paljon näitä turvallisuustutkimusvaiheita on [koronarokotteiden kohdalla] jätetty väliin ja kuinka paljon turvallisuustutkimuksia on peukaloitu ... Pfizer poimi pois kolmosvaiheessa kaikki koehenkilöt, joilla oli ollut hankalia allergiareaktioita, jotta rokote saatiin näyttämään turvallisemmalta... Tuloksia on peukaloitu ... Koronarokotteeseen kohdistetaan epärealistisia toiveita (Videon kohdassa 1:51:00>)
Vaikka eliitti "repiikin" sille epäedulliset "jatkoon päässeet" kansalaisaloitteet, kannustan näyttämään muille esimerkkiä yrittämisestä (pian pedosatanistit on linnassa ja kaikki on taas hyvin:))
There is a reason why they don't want people in churches, bars, and large groups in private places. That is where information is passed. That is where revolutions begin.
Video (5:30): 20/20 näkö? Planeettoja on linjassa 21.-25. joulukuuta ja se saa aikaan "positiivisen energiamyrskyn". Niille joiden keho on puhdas raskasmetalleista, tämä luonnollinen tapahtuma on erittäin myönteinen. Suuri linjaus tässä. Koko elokuva tässä
8kun-Ron: In the past hour or so, I have been reached out to by a dozen or so journalists from "different publications" coincidentally asking the same question. MSM has their marching orders.
PM:Barr leaving may be a sign. For 4 years, DOJ failed to prosecute DC corruption and should have released info on Biden family crimes. If Trump has given up on the DOJ, he may ask the military to step up. The change of top brass at the Pentagon Nov 9th may have been the first sign.
IPOT: THIS DAM VIDEO (Toim: Trumpin twiitissä "Dam vaccines" on tarkoituksella väärinkirjoitettu > Beaver Dam ...)
Mitä kuuluu operaatio Kisuomelle?
Kansanedustaja Gaetz: The "Chimerica Dream" has been advanced by the establishment in both parties.
[CCP:n lahjoma] Media ja kuvernöörit eivät päätä kuka seuraava presidentti USAssa on.
Muista että Yhdysvalloissa perustuslaki menee muiden lakien edelle (ja sama Suomessa kun puhutaan "maskipakosta", 5G:n "turvattomuudesta", rajanylityksestä, kehosi koskemattomuudesta...)
Mitkään poikkeuslait eivät ylitä [Suomen] perustuslakia
Article II of the U.S. Constitution leaves decisions about how electors will be chosen to state legislatures (legislatures are "mostly Republican")
I trust The Plan. Do You?
Tämä on hyvä myös muistaa: Jos Bidenista tulisi presidentti, kaikki truherit ympäri maailman, minut mukaan luettuna, päätyisivät "vankilaan", niin tärkeästä asista tässä on kyse. Patriootit Yhdysvalloissa eivät tule koskaan enää sallimaan, että läpimädästä satanistista tulee heidän presidenttinsä.
Trump retwiittasi: Election Status: Trump is in the process of proving he won, and Biden is pretending he did.
Praying Medic: After the legal battles are settled, it will be up to VP Pence (President of the Senate) to decide on Jan 6 which electors are legitimate and which are not.
Vorhies: State Assemblies have ultimate authority on who the slate of electors are, per article 2 of the constitution. They do not need permission from the the federal government to do this. The decision on how to count the votes falls squarely on the president of the Senate - Pence.
Gabistä: I'm not sure if you grasp the absolute big deal it is that SolarWinds is admitting to with this "hack"... You can basically do whatever you want to any computer you want (except Macs..). You can see whatever you want, you can configure the tool however you want (no notification to the user - ie. completely invisible to the user).
If that computer is powered on and connected to the internet, I would have full control of it and all of its data, if it was a Windows machine.
8kun-Ron (ja moni muu "top-truther" sanoo suunnilleen samaa): I think today's the day. Dominoes falling left and right. Trump is about to hit it out of the park.
Päivitys koskien Assangen armahtamista: Uutisankka. Papin lähde osoittautui vialliseksi.
Gen. Flynnin pappi: President Trump will pardon Julian Assange. (Ron: Assange pardon may open up murder and conspiracy charges against certain people... For those that dont know, Assange is a key. Trump gains huge power by pardoning Assange)
Vapauden Puolesta 121220 -Rokotteista, immunivasteesta, vastustuskyvystä, terveysviranomaisia kohtaan langenneista valituksista ja syytteistä sekä median toiminnasta pandemian tiedottamisessa .. Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutautien erikoislääkäri Rauli Mäkelä ja kansalaisvaikuttaja Ossi Tiihonen
YT ja GoogleGestapo olivat alhaalla ainakin USAssa, mutta tuntuvat taas toimivan
Voit ladata listan 2 miljoonasta CCP:n vakoojasta tässä (moni "lataussivu" on jo "räjäytetty", mutta uusia tulee koko ajan. @Perpetualmaniac ja @hyvee Twatterissä tuntuvat päivittävän tuota tietoa)
Rudy: Don't let them push this off on Hunter. ”THE BOSS” is Joe Biden. He got 50% of all the illegal millions for 30 years. All in the written texts in the Hard Drive. I've got it.
FBI sat on Hunter’s crimes to help JoeBiden. FBI knew ericswalwell was banging a Chinese Spy and let him stay on the Intel Committee. FBI knew the Russia dossier was fake but still investigated Trump. Does China run the FBI?
Kalifornia tyhjenee mm. hullun demokraattikuvernöörin rajujen koronarajoitteiden takia: As Tech Flees Silicon Valley, Rents Plunge "California Gov. Gavin Newsom told CNBC he was not worried about Elon leaving any time soon.” Musk moves now to Texas.
Linkki "CCP:n databaseen" tässä. @hyvee7 twitterissä kääntää listaa englanniksi parhaillaan.
Päivitys kello 21:40 (YT sensuroi): Vapauden puolesta - Todella hyvä striimi: "Rokotteista, immunivasteesta, vastustuskyvystä, terveysviranomaisia kohtaan langenneista valituksista ja syytteistä sekä median toiminnasta pandemian tiedottamisessa." YT poisti, ladataan kohta tänne ja tänne ja tänne
Kiinalaisilta kopioitu korruptio rehottaa Suomessa: Ala-arvoisesti suoriutuneille maahanmuuttajaoppilaille paperit ammattikouluista Opetuslautakunnan jäsen Henna Kajava: "Minulle soitti jo eläköitynyt ammattikoulun opettaja kertoakseen, kuinka ammattikouluissa oppilaanohjaajat painostavat opettajia päästämään ala-arvoisesti suoriutuneet maahanmuuttajataustaiset oppilaat läpi kouluista"
Hyvää matskua truthereiltamme: TOTUUDEN ETSIJÄT - KYSELYILTA 10.12.2020 (Mm. Viron 7 days of darkness, Warp Speedin todellinen tarkoitus on saada armeija "huomaamatta" ympäri USA pahiksia poimimaan, Suomi on laittomuuden tilassa [koska perustuslakia ei noudateta])
Myös Englannissa (siis kuten Virossa) ihmisiä varoitellaan mahdollisesta "ruokapulasta", siellä tosin (teko?) syynä on Brexit: British supermarkets warned to stash food "UK ministers have reportedly warned retailers to start stockpiling food for fear of potential shortages"
Tässä yksi analyysi edellistä lakimuutosta koskien (odt)
Tässä vajaan tuhannen suomalaisen allekirjoittama kirje, jossa THL:lle esitettiin kysymyksiä koronavirukseen liittyen (odt) (En tiedä koska kirje alunperin THL:lle lähetettiin, ja kuinka moni sen on lähettänyt)
SGTReport: The coup plan is to turn on old JoeBiden now, force him to step down and implant wholly corrupt KamalaHarris as President - who NO ONE would ever have voted for.
Moni lääkäri menettää lupansa ajaessaan potilaidensa (ja siis kansan) parasta:VACCINE STUDY COSTS DOCTOR HIS LICENSE (Toim: Teollisuus ei halua tehdä tutkimusta, jossa verrataan rokotettujen ja rokottamattomien lasten terveyttä, koska "kaikki" tietävät, että rokotetut sairastuvat "monta kertaa enemmän" kuin rokottamattomat)
Simon Parkes selittää "eilisessä" videossaan sen mistä KV tuli ja kuinka, ja kuinka USA sai aikaa valmistautua sen tuloon (alkaa 10:15)
Praying Medic: The week that dozens of our friend's YouTube accounts were suspended was the week Hunter Biden's crimes were first exposed. Makes sense now?
Lin Wood: If USA ever had to go to war against Communist China, I wonder for which side the following GA officials would fight?
9.12.2020:
Käyttämässäni kotisivupalvelussa, Aavassa, oli järjestelmävika, joka saatiin juuri korjattua. Pahoittelut jokaiselle teistä tuhansista päivittäisistä lukijoistani, ja kiitos teille sivustoni, ja sen sisältämän tiedon jakamisesta. Suuri herääminen jatkuu, And Q is Back!
Valtamedia murhaa ihmisiä valheillaan ja salailullaan: Rudy uudelleentwiittasi: THE SUPRESSION OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE WAS A CRIME AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THIS PLANET. Thousands died in what is actually Murder by Fake News.
Georgialainen kansanedustaja: Nothing will make you angrier today than watching this video. It’s a Chinese official BRAGGING about bribing Hunter Biden and getting the Big Guy elected
IF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS DETERMINE THAT RESIDENTS OF THE STATE ARE NOT DEVELOPING SUFFICIENT IMMUNITY FROM COVID-19, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MANDATE VACCINATION FOR ALL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS WHO, AS SHOWN BY CLINICAL DATA, ARE PROVEN TO BE SAFE TO RECEIVE SUCH VACCINE. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
IPOT (Sis. videon, jonka DJT juuri uud. twiittasi, ja jonka Twatter poisti - Ja: CCP vaatii: DJT, Rudy, Sidney, ym on eliminoitava!) : DOWN FOR THE COUNT
Eilisistä "lennoista": They could be used as a SCIF for secure meetings?
Rudy: The “Bank Heist” tape changes the result in Georgia. The State Legislature has no choice but to assume its powers under the US Constitution, article II (1) [2] and select Trump electors.
Voit myös "googlettaa" itse. Käytä esim. hakusanoja "vaccine infertility" ja "spermacidal corn"
Sidney kommentoi äänten uudelleenlaskua: Must be a forensic audit to include machine algorithms, servers, conduct at English Street warehouse lunchroom, ballot envelopes and registration cards. Otherwise meaningless exercise & wasted tax dollars
Trumpin nimittämän (ent?) CIA:n johtajan mahdollisesta kuolemasta/pidättämisestä Frankfurtin "2020 ääntenlaskujupakan" yhteydessä löyty joy monia artikkeleja. Tässä pari:
The UK government has granted Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued, enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week (The Independent)
TW video: A few started, more and more people joined: "Mask-free through the city". Sooo good. Germany, Leipzig.
PS:n Mäkelä twiittasi: Vähän tussahti debaatti elvytyspaketin kansanäänestyksestä. Sain tuntiin vain yhden puheenvuoron, kun Kurvinen ehkä 5. Näin vaiennetaan eduskunta, tervetuloa vaan liittovaltio
Kuinka helppoa ihmisten manipulointi on? Amazing Polly: THIS IS TOO IMPORTANT "You [who just want to be a good guy] don't want a world without people fighting for your freedom"
Wall Street on varastanut 100 biljoonaa viimeisten 10 v aikana ja pessyt toisen moikoman. Nuo rahat/iso osa niistä voidaan takavarikoida/neuvotella valtiolle. Noilla rahoilla voidaan maksaa valtion velka ja armahtaa ihmisten velkoja ”järjestelmän tasapainottamiseksi”.
75% sheriffeistä ei valvo (hyväksy) maskipakkoja/liikkumiskieltoja
”Viholliset” Iran ja Kiina ovatkin oikeasti Englanti ja Israeli
Julians Rum: The Biden boot is coming (Toim: China-Biden valokuvattiin juuri "nilkkalääkärillä", ortosaapas peittää kätevästi vangin seurantapannan)
CBS: Joe Biden's doctor says he suffered "hairline fractures" in foot after he slipped while playing with dog
29.11.2020:
Tarvitsemme koronarokotteen ja pian - Ihmisiä kuolee 0.00001:täin!
Taloustieteilijä Tuomas Malinen: #Democracy is dying in #Finland , and across #Europe , due to the dishonesty surrounding the #RecoveryFund . Suomalainen demokratia on kuolemassa. Meidän pitäisi olla äärimmäisen huolissamme.
Tuomas Malinen: My dear people. This is what we have arrived to. Citizens petition demanding a referendum on the #recoveryfund has disappeared from the schelude of the Parliament of #Finland ! This is an outrage! We are not a democracy anymore!
TM jatkaa: Just talked with an expert of our Constitutional Committee. No one seems to have any idea when the MPs get to discuss on the petition! Maybe next year!
Ja sitten Ylen valeuutisia: Joe Biden saattaa tuoda Yhdysvallat takaisin Iranin ydinaseohjelmaa hillitsevään sopimukseen ("Roskalinkki" jätetty tarkoituksella pois)
Asianajaja Lin Wood: "I guarantee you the real vote was an overwhelming landslide for Donald Trump. The servers that were seized in Frankfurt a few days ago, from a company called Scytl. Those servers show the real vote. Trump won this election with 410 Electoral votes"
Ehdoton luettava (toksikologilta): New Strain? Or Antibody Dependent Enhancement? "Scientists have been trying to make coronavirus vaccines for decades and have not been successful. Previous SARS-CoV vaccines that they initially thought were successful because of the robust antibody production, turned out to make the disease worse when subjects were challenged by infection. So let’s look at antibodies."
Antti Heikkilä: Ralf Ludwig, juristi ja fiksu mies esitti, että pandemia on ohi
Argenta FB:ssä: Berlin [15/11?], thousands of German Patriots, without masks, attempt an assault on Parliament: they are protesting against the Covid restrictions. Clashes with the police.
Former Apostolic Nuncio to the US, Arch Bishop Vigano’s open letter to President Trump warns of a ‘Great Reset’ plot to destroy humanity. “It is not surprising that the enemy is angered at being discovered... undisturbed.” Read his letter here.
Praying Medic: - Jos käyt lääkärissä sinut kirjataan Covidiksi : It's flu season. Most of us are carrying the virus. If we were tested, we would likely test positive, even if we had no symptoms. Hospitals now have mandatory testing. Come in with back pain and test positive for the flu, and you're now a covid admission.
Twitteristä: South Australia will enter a six-day "circuit breaker" COVID-19 lockdown overnight that'll see schools, bars and restaurants close, only 1 person per household permitted to leave home each day and exercise outside [is] banned
Twitteristä: Schumer saying Biden can cancel first $50,000 in student debt via executive order. And will do so in first 100 days. This will change so many lives.
Jussi Halla-aho: "Macronin mielestä median uutisointi siitä, että Ranskan ongelmien taustalla on maassa vallitseva rasismi ja islamofobia on tulkittavissa islamistisen väkivallan oikeutukseksi." Meillä samaa tekevät median lisäksi ministerit.
Tässä pähkinänkuoressa CNN (shit): President Trump just arrived at his golf course.
Moni poliitikko suojelee pedofiileja: Mr. Wiener, your bill, SB145, protects child molesters from being forced to register as sex offenders. As a mother of three children, parents deserve to know who has abused children.
Tanskassa miekkaroidaan "yhdeksättä päivää" pähkähulluja pakkorokotuksia vastaan: Law that "would be able to define groups of people who must be vaccinated. People who refuse the above can be coerced through physical detainment, with police allowed to assist."
Sidney Powell: The evidence will show that #Dominion and #Smartmatic were created for the precise evil purpose of rigging elections for corrupt rulers. And the companies are foreign owned, created with communist money.
NYTIMES (Oct 29, 2006): “The concerns about possible ties between the owners of Smartmatic and the Chávez government have been well known to United States foreign-policy officials since before the 2004 recall election...”
Enoch: Where have I heard that military is the only way forward before? - Sidney Powell: This should be investigated by military intelligence for its national security implications
Julians Rum: If the local authorities won’t step up, I don’t see any other way than the Military.
Mitä pohjoismaiden Wikipedian sivut sanovat tänään Trumpista 2020 presidentinvaaleihin liittyen: Suomi - Suht neutraali, Ruotsi - Ei mitään, Norja - Trump hävisi. Vertailun vuoksi englanninkielinen sivu:
Suomeksi:
Ruotsiksi:
Norjaksi:
Englanniksi:
Facebook poisti Trumpin tililtä presidentin tittelin:
JoeM: The Spanish election manipulation company behind #Dominion software was RAIDED by a large US ARMY force in Germany during which they SIEZED servers!
Twitteristä: Mamu hakkasi vihreiden ex-puoluesihteerin lähes hengiltä. Ilmankos valtamedia ei ole kertonut tätä:
12.11.2020:
Moni asioista perilläoleva on sitä mieltä, että netti mahdollisesti suljetaan (ainakin jossain päin maailmaa ja ainakin joksikin aikaa) hyvin pian, todennäköisesti juuri ennen kuin Trump julistetaan virallisesti vaalien voittajaksi. Netin tilan näet livenä tässä. ( Tuon sivuston mukaan "normikatkoksia" on maailmalla n. 11.000/tunti, Yhdysvalloissa n.6.500/tunti.)
The absurd amount of "settings" on the Dominion Voting Software is off-the-charts. If I was a local IT guy, I could probably setup the voting machine to give myself an elected position without ever being on any ballot or running any campaign.
Praying Medic eilen: Regarding the election, the fake narrative has been defeated. Trump has hinted that evidence of fraud is coming. If social media platforms intend to hit the kill switch, that would be an opportune time. Only cable news left? Who controls? Emergency Broadcast System? Mayday
Lisää aiheesta sivustollani tässä (hakusana abort tai parenthood)
68% yhdysvaltalaisista oli vuonna 2014 sitä mieltä, että vaalit ovat vilpillisiä. Biden’s choice for chief of staff, Ron Klain, agreed that American “elections are rigged” in 2014 tweet:
Praying Medic: Create accounts on other platforms. But POTUS needs Patriots on Twitter now, more than ever. Our assignment is to refute the false narratives of the mainstream media. Digital soldiers do not leave the field of battle.
Englannissa:40% want politicians to take coronavirus vaccine first [before citizens] to prove it's safe (Toim: Suomessa voitaisiin aloittaa pääministeristä ja poliitikoista ja rokotteet arpomalla kansalle suunnatuista eristä)
DailyMail kysely: Otatko rokotteen heti kun se on saatavilla? 52% ei ota:
Koko kysely:
Onko mielesi avoin? Vaikea aihe hyvästä lähteestä - Ent. CIA, Nobel ehdotettu, vuoden 2012 presidenttikandidaatti Robert David Steele haastattelee Kerry Cassidya (Video 31:05): Secret Space Force, Extraterrestials, Near Future
CNN:ällä menee pasmat sekaisin kun Biden saa yht'äkkiä 110.000 ääntä:
Trump & Co. (patriootit) virittivät taas kerran ansan demokraateille (globalisteille); vaalivilppiin varauduttiin ja se dokumentoitiin huolella. Korkein oikeus käsittelee vilpin ja pian vaalit ympäri maailman ovat pitkästä aikaa oikeasti demokraattiset.
TOP DOC CONFIRMS: COVID IS OVER Thousands of doctors around the world are saying: the pandemic is over. So, why is Europe headed for a second lockdown? Dr. Yeadon believes …
Ilmiantajia ei jätetä yksin (Yhdysvalloissa potkujen saannin myötä menee usein sekä jo tienattu eläke että sairausvakuutukset) - 90.000 dollaria jo lahjoitettu:
Dailymail: There IS another way to beat coronavirus ... we need to find a way out of the mess that does no more damage than the virus itself ... Our strategy would be to tackle the four key failings. We must address the problems in the Government's mass testing programme; we must tackle the blight of confused and contradictory statistics; we must make real efforts to protect and isolate those who are vulnerable; and we must inform the public about the true and quantifiable costs of lockdown (as if they needed telling).
4.11.2020 "Ääntenlasku ja vaalivilpinpaljastuspäivä" - The Great Awakening continues:
Oma sivuni vuoden 2016 vaalivilpistä tässä. (Yksi vaalivilppikeinoista on painaa omia äänestyslipukkeita, ongelma niissä on se, että niitä tulee helposti lisättyä liikaa "oikeiden" joukkoon. Esimerkiksi siksi monissa äänestyspiireissä ääniä on joskus enemmän kuin äänestäjiä)
Kello 9:24 Äänistä on vielä "pieni" osa laskematta, mutta: Onnea Presidentti Trumpille toiselle kaudelle!
Praying Medic: Trump has an insurmountable lead in Georgia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. These states should be called. POTUS is closing the gap in Arizona. The only way Biden wins is by cheating.
Praying Medic retweettasi: ALERT: #Florida #Republicans have expanded their lead to 212,411 votes. This includes all votes cast. Data per FL GOP GOTV Tracker.
PrayingMedic: Trump's rush to get a vaccine available is his way of providing a medically defensible reason not to lock us down again. Biden and the media's push to delay a vaccine will be used to justify more lockdowns and institute The Great Reset (= A plan to destroy private businesses through lockdowns, implement government healthcare, guaranteed minimum income, debt forgiveness, contact tracing, forced vaccinations, and a state of permanent lockdown.)
2.11.2020 - 1 päivä historian tärkeimpiin vaaleihin "This is not about R vs. D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard." Q
1.11.2020 - 2 päivää historian tärkeimpiin vaaleihin "This is not about R vs. D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard." Q
Put down the hopium pipe ja katso tämä tuore missdanaashlie.com:in video (Muistathan että on olemassa pieni mahdollisuus, "tämä kaikki" onkin osa suurta psy-oppia, ja että Q ja DJT ovatkin diippareiden "marionetteja")
Dailymail: National security nightmare of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop containing phone numbers for the Clintons, Secret Service officers and most of the Obama cabinet plus his sex and drug addictions - all secured by the password Hunter02
Eiliseen postaukseeni liittyen - En olisi liian huolissaan Suuresta Resetistä, vaikka mahdollisesti pian tuleva koronarokote todennäköisesti tuleekin olemaan ihmisen terveydelle todella, todella haitallinen:
AWK:n tuore video selittää mm. sitä, miksi "vaalikyselyt" ovat harhaanjohtavia (mm: demokraatit pelkäävät Covidia ja äänestävät mielummin postitse): Americans LOVE FREEDOM! We will WIN BIG!
31.10.2020 - 3 päivää historian tärkeimpiin vaaleihin "This is not about R vs. D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard." Q
Kenraali Flynn twiittasi eilen: Former Apostolic Nuncio to the US, Arch Bishop Vigano’s open letter to President Trump warns of a ‘Great Reset’ plot to destroy humanity. “It is not surprising that the enemy is angered at being discovered... undisturbed.” Read his letter here
Suomalaisia truthereita eliminoidaan eri alustoilta. Tässä back-upeja:
Antifa people can just say "I'm press!" and be let off the hook LAPD just sent out this memo detailing how interactions w/members of the media should be handled during protests/unrest. Media credentials will NOT be required, and “the inability to produce ID does not preclude an individual from acting as a member of the media.”
James Woods: The great thing about Democrat criminals is that they always manage to incriminate themselves on video or audio. Listen to this recording of bagman #HunterBiden discussing his woes. This is grand jury material here, folks
EOW: Communism seeks to make one’s personal property the property of the state. Every communist regime has said the same thing—socialism’s goal is communism.
OANN Chief White House Correspondent: I now have possession (sans photos), of the #Biden Hard Drive. It is the @fbi’s DUTY to directly address and inform the American people what it has known about the BidenCrimeFamily for years.
Project Veritas: 1,200,000+ views in 3 hours and @Twitter is doing everything imaginable outside of literally shutting our account down to slow the spread of this video.
Bobulinski oli eilen Foxin haastateltavana - Julian's Rum: I follow all the MSM handles. From what I’ve seen, none have tweeted a single thing about Tucker’s Bobulinski interview.
Jr.:We went from 75,000 flu deaths last year in America to almost 0. Does anyone actually believe that? Or do you think there may be allocation games being played to manipulate the truth?
KUN DJT vaalipäivänä vie voiton, MSM yksiäänisesti toteaa, ettei se pidä paikkaansa
Biden elää kellarissa samalla kun Trump vetää monta rallia päivässä
Diippareiden suunnitelma on viedä USA sekasortoon - Värivallankumous - Mutta edelliseen on valmistauduttu hyvin
Jos Biden voittaisi vaalit, kuinka kauan hän Valkoisessa talossa istuisi? - Hän on suuri turvallisuusuhka USA:lle
Armeijan rooli: Obama vaihtoi [pois monta isänmaallista] kenraaleita - DJT voi turvautua Insurrection Actiin, joka antaa presidentille suuret valtuudet toimia
Korkeimpaan oikeuteen on nyt saatu konservatiivien enemmistö - MSM suomessa kauhistelee kun nyt siellä saatetaan tehdä isänmaallisia päätöksiä - USA on ollut sotatilassa sitten 911 [sotaoikeus voi nyt tuomita kuolemaan maanpetoksesta]
Jarmon tietolähteinä on mm. some (mm. kansalaistoimittajat)
Todella kova some-lockdown odotettavissa - Somen alkuperäinen tarkoitus on ollut ihmisten mielipiteisiin vaikuttaminen
Q on sotilastiedustelua - Alle 10 hengen ryhmä - Kenraali Flynn, USA:n sotilastiedustelun ent. johtaja peukuttaa Q:ta
Tässä oma listani: Yle, IL, IS, HS, AL, SK, TS,...
Trump: Joe Biden called me George yesterday. Couldn’t remember my name. Got some help from the anchor to get him through the interview. The Fake News Cartel is working overtime to cover it up! (Video tässä)
We were told initially that the premise for lockdown was to ‘flatten the curve’ and therefore protect the NHS from being overwhelmed.
It is clear that at no point was the National Health Service (NHS) in any danger of being overwhelmed, and since May 2020 covid wards have been largely empty; and crucially the death toll from covid has remained extremely low.
Their aim: To end all lockdowns ... and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity.
Mustat muuttaneet mieltään Trumpin suhteen - Rasmussen Reports: National Daily Black Likely Voter Job Approval For POTUS - October 19-26, 2020:
USA on ollut sotatilassa vuosikaudet. Loppuuko sota kohta?:
Miksi hesari ei uutisoi?:
Anti-Trump protesters rip flags off vehicles part of the #JewsForTrump vehicle convoy. Throw red paint on vehicles, punch Trump supporters.
Junes Lokka: Tästäkin Saska tai @mikahentunen voisi kertoa kuinka heidän toverinsa hyökkäävät juutalaisten kimppuun, repivät lippuja, sotkevat autot maalilla ja lyövät ihmisiä eli suvakit niitä aitoja antisemitistejä ja pitäisi muutenkin laittaa kaikki vankilaan
Kansanedustaja kommentoi sitä, kuinka media kieltäytyy uutisoimasta Bideneiden rikoksista: The media went through Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbook and childhood calendars but won’t go through Hunter Biden’s laptop?
Ekman: Senaattoriehdokas Lauren Witzken mukaan Hunterin tietokoneella on kuvia senaattori Chris Coonin tyttärestä ja 7:stä muusta alaikäisestä. Coonin 13-vuotias tytär oli yksi lapsista, joita muistamme Joen lähennelleen v. 2015 senaatin virkaanastujaisissa.
JoeM ("kaikkien truthereiden" arvostama patriootti) tuuttasi: Joe Biden, head of an international money laundering crime family, most likely had his wife and child murdered. His two sons, Hunter and Beau were injured. This means he tried to kill Hunter also. No wonder the kid ratted out his dad
Kiinan tiedustelupalvelut (ja Kiinan kommunistipuolue) saavat "laillisen" pääsyn kaiikien meidän "salaisuuksiin" Kiinalaisen Huawein avulla. Moni maa on jo sanonut tuolle hulluudelle ei, viimeisimpänä Italia:
Edellisessä on yksinkertaistettuna kyse siitä, annetaanko Kiinalle kaikki, siis todella kaikki tieto meistä vai ei. 5G:n avulla Huawei saisi kerättyä tuota tietoa, ja Kiinan lain mukaan joutuisi luovuttamaan tuon tiedon valtiolle (Kiinan kommunistipuolueelle). Jos et ole perehtynyt siihen, mitä kaikkea tuolla tiedolla voidaan sinunkin manipuloimiseksi tehdä (eikä nyt ole kyse mainoksista ja ostamisesta) suosittelemme katsomaan seuraavan videon: Maailman synkimmät salaisuudet
Tässä muutama linkki suosittujen sensuroitujen patrioottien tileille:
dlive.tv/M3thods
rumble.com/c/X22Report
gab.com/StormIsUponUs (JoeM)
video.ibm.com/recorded/128329520 (PrayingMedic)
Twitteristä: There are only a few good ones left there [at Fox]: Hannity, Tucker, Ingraham, Gutfield, Dobbs, Watters, Pirro, Bartiromo, Hegseth
Vaalitentissä tänään Buy-den valehteli: "En ole koskaan sanonut että vastustan vesisärötystä", johon DJT vastasi sanomalla että postaa tuon valheen paljastavan videon aiheesta. Video tässä.
A Chinese Whistleblower claimed on September 24th that three hard drives had been mailed to the DoJ.
These hard drives contained, essentially, all the blackmail the Chinese had on Hunter Biden, as well as blackmail about US Congressmen, Xi's financial assets, a pedophilic sex tape involving Hunter Biden, and the Chinese plan to take over the US and the UN.
This [tuutattu] video was recorded on Sept 24th and published on September 30th. (Video tässä)
Bidenin logo:
22.10.2020:
Mukavaa perjantaita! Ohjelmassa "tänään":
Hunter/Joe (+Tony Bobulinski) texts/emails and pics.
Bidenien rikollinen kartelli selitettynä alle minuutissa tässä
PM: Senate Judiciary approves the SCOTUS nomination of Amy Coney Barrett. A full Senate vote is scheduled for Monday the 26th. Barrett was nominated by POTUS on September 26th. [Done in 30]
Q eilen: BOOMS EN_ROUTE TOMORROW.
This is not a drill.
Q
PrayingMedic: What motive would the media have for gaslighting the public into thinking Biden has a massive lead when he does not? - Newsweek: Trump loses lead in Texas, where Democrats haven't won since 1976
Twitteristä: Elämme parodiatodellisuudessa. Opettajalta on juuri irroitettu pää opetustyössä esitetyn kuvan takia, ja HS murehtii onko Ranskan presidentti puhunut rumia
Halla-Aho: Media on rummuttanut surutta - ja yleisen käytännön vastaisesti - rikoksesta epäillyn nimeä ja naamaa. Nyt olisi ehkä anteeksipyynnön paikka? - STT/IL: Tero Ala-Tuuhonen ei ole enää epäiltynä murhan yrityksestä
21.10.2020:
Fox's Ingraham on Twitter: Your Daily Reminder: Every reporter and talking head in DC knows that Biden is a puppet for rich people, that a lot have ties to the CCP, and that his family made a fortune as a result.
Dutchsinseltä tuli todella hyvää materiaalia jo kymmenisen vuotta sitten. Nyt hän "erikoistuu" maanjäristyksiin. Tutustu ja vedä omat johtopäätöksesi: Very Large Earthquake M7.5 and Tsunami Warning in Alaska (Jos YT sulki: dutchsinse.com)
Seuraavilla videoilla nähtävien dokumenttien aitoutta ei ole tiettävästi pystytty vielä vahvistamaan, ja meitä varoitetaan feikeistä dokumenteista tämän tästä, mutta aihe, adrenokromin tuottaminen, on todellinen, ja hirvittävä ongelma:
Twitteristä: Ei sanaakaa islamista, terrorismista tai jihadista. Yle= taattua propagandaa. "Tuhannet kokoontuivat kunnioittamaan surmattua opettajaa Pariisissa – Ei ajattelun totalitarismille"
Twitteristä: Kaikki yhä muistaa, kun Stubb servasi Trumpin:
Donald Trump: "Ruotsilla on ongelma."
Alexander Stubb: "Presidentti Trump, Ruotsi on yksi maailman rikkaimmista, pakolaismyönteisimmistä, liberaaleimmista, monikulttuurisimmista ja turvallisimmista paikoista Telluksessa."
Yle tänään: Rikollisjengi julisti tukholmalaislähiöön ulkonaliikkumiskiellon – tutkija: osoitus rikollisten suuresta vaikutusvallasta alueella
Suosittelen kaikille: Pedo-asiantuntija Shaun Attwoodin video (hänen oma kanavansa on blokattu) jossa käydään läpi ”nettipedofilian” eri muotoja, pedofilian normalisoinnin keinoja, jne. Tästä ”K-13” -videosta on poistettu "häiritsevä kuvamateriaali": THE DARKEST NET - Episode 1 With Shaun Attwood
Lisää pedofiliasta omalla sivustollani pedogate.fi (pizzagate.fi)
U.S. Attorney Huber: Federal charges filed in 3 recent Utah child pornography cases. “The Smith investigation is the third disturbing child pornography case that U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber’s office has filed in recent weeks.”
James Woods: Americans lined up for hours to see President Trump. A Biden rally can’t fill a strip mall parking lot
Q postasi: Just saw for myself a behind the scenes look at the #HunterBiden hard drive: Drugs, underage obsessions, power deals…
Ja:
Without you [isänmaalliset anonit], collectively, there would have been no way to bypass their control.
Toim: Liity meihin. Tutki ja jaa.
Voitto kulku jatkuu - Äänten oltava perillä marraskuun 3. päivä: A Michigan appeals court overturned an extension that allowed absentee ballots to be received two weeks after Election Day, ruling that the votes must instead be received by 8 p.m. on Nov. 3.
Twitteistä: Quite extraordinary moment in France this morning... The homes and offices of France's health minister and director general of health have been searched by police as part of a judicial enquiry into the government's handling of the #coronavirus pandemic
Ja hyväähän postiäänestyksessä on myös se, että äänesi kulkee tavallisen postin joukossa todella pitkän matkan, jonka matkan aikana tuhansilla epärehellisillä (lue: lahjotuilla) postin työntekijöillä on mahdollisuus poimia ei-toivotut (merkatut) äänet pois ja heittää ne roskiin.
Crimes against Humanity "Viikossa miljoona katsonutta" (video 49:00) - Reiner Fuellmich, a German lawyer, is one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee ... international network of lawyers ... the Corona Fraud Scandal ... probably the greatest crime against humanity ever.
"Kaikki sinunkin tekstarisi ja mailisi" tallentanut NSA saattaa pian käydä twattereiden (Twitter, FB, Google...) kimppuun: NSA Tackles 2020 Election Security
Halla-Ahon tuore twiitti (ketju): 1/ Elämme varmaan jonkinlaisia lopun aikoja. Intersektionaaliset feministit ovat vallassa, mikä näkyy mm. siten, että...
Robert haastattelee kansalaisjournalistia, joka on 10 vuoden ajan työskennellyt WikiLeaksin (ja Julian Assangen) kanssa, ja joka parhaillaan seuraa paikanpäältä Assangen oikeudenkäyntiä Lontoossa: Julian Assange Update: Juan Luis Reports from the UK Courtroom
Aina mahtavia videoita tekevä IPOT selittää Haitia tässä. Haiti on todennäköisesti yksi tärkeimmistä ihmis- ja lapsikaupan keskuksista ja Clintonit on tiukasti linkitetty Haitiin (Hillaryn veli omistaa kultakaivoksia Haitissa - lapsia kuljetetaan tunneleita pitkin laivoihin) Teen jonkinnäköisen lyhennelmän videon sisällöstä lähipäivinä.
Yazkalta kaksi todella mielenkiintoista haastattelua:
Rinta-Joupin autoliikkeiden valomainostauluilla nähtiin kesäkuussa 2020 useita "Q-mainoksia" ympäri Suomen. Kuvia jaettiin somessa satojatuhansia kertoja:
Globalistien käsikirjasta: Luo ongelma, johon sinulla on ratkaisu.
Ehdoton katsottava (39:37):
Suomen Sosiaali- ja terveysministeri Aino-Kaisa Pekonen ja joukko muita "ministereitä" lukevat saman rokotemainoksen kansalle. Ketkä ovat tuon rokotemainoksen takana? Amazing polly kertoo aiheesta: The Global Health Mafia Protection Racket
Videolla osoitetaan mm. se, kuinka SAMAT tahot, jotka olivat lokakuisen "koronaepidemiaharjoituksen" takana, saavat nuo kerätyt varat käyttöönsä. Videolla myös EU-komission pj. Leyen ylistää YSTÄVÄÄNSÄ, KIINALAISTA NAM:n (=WHO ja Maailmanpankki) johtajaa tri. Dzauta, ja sanoo myös ettei "varojenkeruu" olisi onnistunut ilman häntä. Kuvassa NAM:n logo, jossa KÄÄRME ja selvästi 666:
Päivitys 6.1.2019: Q 6/1: https://www.foreignassistance.gov/explore�
Why, for decades, has the UN encouraged donor countries to contribute 0.7% of their gross domestic product (GDP) on foreign aid?
The corruption (infiltration) at the top (WW) has spread like cancer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ�
Listen again, carefully.
The Great Awakening.
Q
Tässä ote Pekka Lahtisen vuonna 1994 kirjoittamasta kirjasta Maailman Yhdentyminen. Koko kirjan voit lukea täällä:
YHDISTYNEET KANSAKUNNAT
Ensimmäisen maailmansodan jälkeen maailmaa yhdistävät taustavoimat yrittivät saada aikaan kansainvälisen hallituksen Kansainliiton (League of Nations) avulla. Kansainliiton toi rauhanomaisen yhteistyön nimessä julkisuuteen Yhdysvaltain presidentti Woodrow Wilson apunaan hänen neuvonantajansa eversti House. Kansainliiton peruskirja astui voimaan yhdessä Versaillesin rauhansopimuksen kanssa vuonna 1920. Kansainliittoon liittyivät monet maat mukaan lukien myös Suomi. Wilson, House ja salainen valtaeliitti kokivat kuitenkin nöyryyttävän takaiskun Yhdysvaltojen kieltäytyessä jäsenyydestä. Sen seurauksena Kansainliittomenetti mahtinsa. Vähitellen siitä tuli yhä heikompi, kunnes se lakkautettiin vuonna 1946. Sen sijalle tuli YK, joka myös peri Kansainliiton varat. YK on maailmanjärjestö, joka virallisesti pyrkii säilyttämään kansainvälisen rauhan ja turvallisuuden. Lisäksi se yrittää ratkaistapoliittisia, taloudellisia, sosiaalisia ja kulttuurillisia ongelmia. YK:n säännöt muotoiltiin San Franciscon konferenssissa keväällä 1945. Paikalla olleet Yhdysvaltojen valtuutetut olivat käytännöllisesti katsoen kaikki ulkomaansuhteiden neuvoston eli CFR:n entisiä, sen hetkisiä tai tulevia jäseniä. Säännöt astuivat voimaan 24.10.1945. Rockefellerin suku hankki YK:lle maa-alueen New Yorkista, minne sen päämaja rakennettiin vuonna 1951. Rockefellerin paneeliselostus vuodelta 1958 sisälsi lausunnon: "YK on lopulta symboli maailmanjärjestykselle, joka tullaan rakentamaan jonakin päivänä." YK ilmoitti toukokuussa 1974: "Me YK:n jäsenet julistamme juhlallisesti yhdistyneen päätöksemme tehdä hellittämättömästi työtä uuden kansainvälisen taloudellisen järjestyksen perustamiseksi." CFR:n johtajistoon kuuluva C. Douglas Dillon, joka toimi valtionvarainministerinä presidentti Kennedyn aikana, on todennut: "Tulee viemään aikaa ennen kuin ihmiset tässä maassa kokonaisuutena ovat valmiita luopumaan olennaisesti itsenäisyydestä maailmanlaajuisten ongelmien ratkaisemiseksi. Tulee kehittymään maailmanlaajuisia viranomaisia mahdollisesti YK:n tai vastaavien järjestöjen välityksellä." 1950-luvulla, jolloin Yhdysvallat oli hyvin kommunismin vastainen, YK:n palveluksessa todettiin olevan paljon kommunisteja. Kommunistinen puolue myös tuki YK:ta. Entinen kommunistisen puolueen johtohenkilö Joseph Z.Kornfeder paljasti vuonna 1955 tunnistavansa, että YK:n "suunnitelma" on kommunistinen. Hän oli ollut melkein kolme vuotta Moskovassa kommunistisen puolueen päämajassa, missä hän oppi heidän toimintamallinsa. YK:n taustavoimat eivät koskaan aikoneet tehdä siitä rauhanturvajärjestöä, vaan valtavan Troijan puuhevosen. Kornfeder on sanonut: "YK:n sisäinen rakenne, kommunistisesti suunniteltu, on sosiologisen valloituksen malli, malli joka on tarkoitettu palvelemaan kommunismin tunkeutumista länteen. Se on nerokas ja petollinen." Toimittaja William F. Jasper on tutkinut YK:ta perusteellisesti ja sanookin kirjassaan "Global Tyranny - Step by Step" (Maailmanlaajuinen sortovalta - Askel askeleelta): "CFR on täysin luonut YK:n ja suunnitellut, että siitä lopulta tulisi kaikkimahtavan maailmanhallituksen työkalu." Jasper on monen muun tutkijan ohella myös todennut, että YK:n ja sen alajärjestöjen antama kehitysapu on itse asiassa aiheuttanut paljon enemmän tuhoa kuin hyötyä kehitysmaissa. Samat yksilöt ovat käyttäneet samoja tuhoavia menettelytapoja lukuisissa kehitysmaissa samoin traagisin tuloksin. Ja hyödyn korjaavat aina samat yksilöt ja järjestöt. Miksi YK:n ulkomaanapuviranomaiset eivät opi virheistään? YK:n toimia Somaliassa on arvosteltu hiljattain. Lehdet kirjoittivat otsikoissaan, kuinka YK rikkoo ihmisoikeuksia, Amnesty arvosteli YK-sotilaita, YK:n helikopteri tulitti siviilejä jne. Klaanipäällikkö Mohamed Farah Aideedin syytteet somalien kansanmurhasta saattavatkin pitää paikkansa. Asiaan toi odottamatta valoa uutinen Radio Suomen Aamunpeilissä 9.12.1993, jonka mukaan Somalian nälänhätä oli voitettu jo ennen YK-joukkojen väliintuloa. Operaation sanottiin tapahtuneen USA:n sisäisten pyrkimysten takia. Uutisraportti perustui vastajulkaistuun kirjaan "Operaatio Somalia", jonka ovat kirjoittaneet suomalainen toimittaja Peik Johansson ja somalialainen toimittaja Abdulcadir Mohamed Diesow.
Hankin kyseisen kirjan ja suosittelen sitä kaikille, jotka haluavat lukea suomenkielellä paljastuksia YK:n likaisesta pelistä Somaliassa sekä siihen liittyvistä harhaanjohtavista uutisista maailman tiedotusvälineissä. Kirjan mukaan Somalia-operaatio on esimerkki YK:n täydellisestä fiaskosta. YK ei ollut edes yrittänyt ratkaista ongelmia humanitäärisesti ja poliittisesti. YK:n toimesta tapettiin ja kidutettiin lukuisia siviilejä. YK:n sotilaat pommittivat myös täynnä potilaita ollutta sairaalaa, jolloin yli 60 somalia sai surmansa ja sadat haavoittuivat.
Kirjoittajat sanovat olevan monia syitä Yhdysvaltojen Somalia-operaatioon kuten syksyllä 1992 käyty presidenttipeli USA:ssa. Johansson ja Diesow mainitsevat kirjassaan myös todellisen syyn operaatioon: "Yhdysvallat on puhunut "uudesta maailmanjärjestyksestä" ja nyt oli helppo paikka todistaa maan kiistaton maailmanpoliisin rooli." Johansson ja Diesow eivät kuitenkaan ole ainoita, jotka ovat arvostelleet YK:ta Suomessa. Tekstikombinaatti Paavo Haavikko, Tuomas Keskinen ja Kimmo Pietiläinen julkaisivat joulukuun 1993 alussa ajankohtaiskirjan "Tässä sitä ollaan. Optimistinen arvio", jossa kirjoittajat paljastivat näkemyksensä YK:sta: "Martti Ahtisaari on kasvanut järjestelmässä, jonka koko olemassaolo on tarkoin harkittua propagandaa ja sitä seuraavaa päätöntä toimintaa muiden maksamin kustannuksin, jotka tahtovat jäädä velaksi. YK:ta ruokitaan kuin käenpoikasta, liian vähän." Aamulehti kirjoitti 9.4.1993: "Yli 7500 ammusta löytyi torstaina Bosnian saarrettuun pääkaupunkiin Sarajevoon pyrkineestä YK:n avustusrekasta, kertoivat YK-lähteet torstai-iltana. Kätkön löysivät tiesulkua vartioivat serbit. Löytö oli paha arvovaltatappio YK:lle, joka on kiistänyt serbien aikaisemmat väitteet avustuskuljetusten mukana olevista aseista." Kuinka rauhanturvajoukoilla voi olla aseita avustusrekassa? Tämä kirja on jo antanut ja tulee antamaan vielä yksityiskohtaisemman vastauksen.
A WORLD EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED BY THE UNITED NATIONS
A Preliminary Survey of One Form of a Stable Military Environment
Lincoln P. Bloomfield
Prepared for IDA in support of a study submitted to the Department of State under contract No. SCC 28270, dated February 24, 1961
The judgments expressed in this Study Memorandum are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Defense Analyses or of any agency of the United States Government
Special Studies Group
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES
1710 H Street, N. W.
Washington 6, D.C.
March 10, 1962
FOREWORD
This paper was prepared for project VULCAN, a study of Arms Control and a Stable Military Environment, which was made by the Special Studies Group of IDA for the Department of State under contract No. SCC 28270, dated 24 February 1961. Dr. J. I. Coffey was the Project Leader.
The author, Dr. Lincoln P. Bloomfield, a consultant to the Special Studies Group, has written extensively on the role of the United Nations in international politics. He is Associate Professor of Political Science and Director of the Arms Control Project at the Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Judgments expressed are of course those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Defense Analyses or of any agency of the United States Government.
A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which "world government" would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions, characterized by mandatory universal membership and some ability to employ physical force. Effective control would thus entail a preponderance of political power in the hands of a supranational organization rather than in individual national units, and would assume the effective operation of a general disarmament agreement. While this supranational organization — the United Nations — would not necessarily be the organization as it now exists, the present UN Charter could theoretically be revised in order to erect such an organization equal to the task envisaged, thereby codifying a radical rearrangement of power in the world.
The principal features of a model system would include the following: (1) powers sufficient to monitor and enforce disarmament, settle disputes, and keep the peace —including taxing powers — with all other powers reserved to the nations; (2) an international force, balanced appropriately among ground, sea, air, and space elements, consisting of 500,000 men, recruited individually, wearing a UN uniform, and controlling a nuclear force composed of 50-100 mixed land-based mobile and undersea-based missiles, averaging one megaton per weapon; (3) governmental powers distributed among three branches so that primary functions would exist in some recognizable form in a bicameral legislative organ, an executive organ, and an expanded international judicial network; (4) compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court for both legal disputes and legal aspects of political disputes; (5) approximately 130 political subunits, all nominally independent states, within the system; (6) continued jurisdiction over cosmetic affairs by the national governments; and (7) unrestricted international inspection of all states against violation of the disarmament agreement, with permament (sic) inspection of nuclear research and power equipment, strategic areas and industries, administrative policies and operations, and other key and strategic points in the national economy.
The system of representation in the legislative body of the model government would have to include all the constituent units, with the voting procedure reflecting the relative size, power, and standing of the units. In the absence of individual veto rights, legislative power would be exercised on a weighted basis which acceptably combined population and capacity to contribute to the power of the system. No less important, and of crucial practicality in the effective operation of the model government, would be the financial problems. Finally, underlying the whole enterprise must be a realistic comprehension of the historical requirements for peaceful change.
Clearly, the structure of the model itself can be perceived more easily than the fundamental building blocks of consensus and community which would have to underlie it; although, should such a system ever come into being, it would thenceforth have its own inner dynamic. It is, nevertheless, the question of feasibility which is central to the realization of this model order: it may be unattainable when needed, and unneeded when attainable.
This paper is part of a larger study of Arms Control and a Stable Military Environment. We sketch out one particular form of a stable military environment — "a world effectively controlled by the United Nations," that is to say, by supranational institutions instead of primarily by national governments as at present.
The notion of a "UN-controlled world" is today a fantastic one. That it is even thought of as a hypothetical framework for politico-military planning grows, curiously enough, out of contemporary doctrines on arms control. Political scientists have generally come to despair of quantum jumps to world order as utopian and unmindful of political realities. But fresh minds from military, scientific, and industrial life, as they focus on the increasingly irrational arms race, have sometimes found the logic of world government — and it is world government we are discussing here — inescapable.
The details of international political control have rarely been made explicit in American disarmament positions. The 1946 United States plan for the international control of atomic energy assigned the international agency managerial control or ownership of "all atomic energy activities potentially dangerous to world security," plus "power to control, inspect and license all other atomic activities." To carry this out would have required extraordinary powers at the center. But it was still a distance from that to the political control of the world as a whole implied in the present topic. Throughout the sixteen-year negotiating period, even when programs were advanced for drastic reduction and limitation of armaments, there is no record of any concrete suggestion or even mention of a supranational political organization which would "effectively control" the world.
However, recent exchanges in the great power dialogue have reopened the larger political question. On September 19, 1959, Chairman Khrushchev announced to the UN General Assembly his plan for "general and complete disarmament" within four years. The American response was given by Secretary of State Herter on February 18, 1960, in a speech to the National Press Club. Mr. Herter said that the first goal of the United States in the forthcoming disarmament negotiations was the creation of a "stable military environment." To create such an environment he urged certain arms control actions, such as measures to guard against surprise attack and to curtail the spread of nuclear weapons.
The second stage of Mr. Herter’s counterproposal was that of general disarmament. Two American objectives existed within the disarmament stage. First, the creation of universally accepted rules of law, backed by a world court with effective means of enforcement — "that is, by international armed force." The second objective was disarmament itself — "to the point where no single nation or group of nations could effectively oppose this enforcement of international law by international machinery."
The theme set forth by Mr. Herter was carried into the two proposals made by the United States in the spring of 1960, on March 15 and June 27. Under the latter proposal an International Disarmament Control Organization would be established within the framework of the United Nations in the first stage of disarmament. The second stage would include progressive establishment of an international peace force within the United Nations sufficient to preserve world peace under disarmament. The September 1961 US proposals follow the same pattern.
Here, then, is the basis in recent American policy for the notion of a world "effectively controlled by the United Nations." It was not made explicit, but the United States position carried the unmistakable meaning, by whatever name, of world government, sufficiently powerful in any event to keep the peace and enforce its judgments.
This paper is an attempt to sketch out the possible contours of such a system, followed by a discussion of the difficulties attending an enterprise of this nature. The question of feasibility seems so overwhelming in today’s world, and the common answer on the part of politically sophisticated people so invariably negative, that it may be wondered why the exercise is undertaken at all. It has three justifications. On policy grounds, it would be well to spell out with greater precision that to which this country has committed itself. On heuristic grounds, it may be worthwhile to apply analytical methods to a problem commonly approached on the basis of hunch alone.1Finally, there is always the possibility that sophisticated people will turn out to have been wrong.
Some definitions and boundaries are needed of a "world effectively controlled by the United Nations." "World" means that the system is global, with no exceptions to its fiat: universal membership. "Effectively controlled" connotes government attributes — a relative monopoly of physical force at the center of the system, and thus a preponderance of political power in the hands of a supranational organization rather than in individual national units. "The United Nations" is not necessarily precisely the organization as it now exists. In theory a radical rearrangement of power in the world could be codified through revision of the existing UN Charter (as in the Clark-Sohn Plan); or a new constitution could be designed. Finally, to avoid endless euphemism and evasive verbiage, the contemplated regime will occasionally be referred to unblushingly as a "world government."
The model described below is obviously but one of many possible forms. Equally obviously, it is susceptible to almost infinite variation. But in general, this is what "a world effectively controlled by the United Nations" might look like.
A limited would government has powers sufficient to monitor and enforce disarmament, settle disputes, and keep the peace. All other powers are reserved to the nations. It possesses enforceable taxing powers to finance its political organs, its disarmament policing agency, and its international military force, which includes a nuclear component. The nations are disarmed to police levels.
The international force, balanced appropriately between ground, sea, air, and space elements, consists of 500,000 men, recruited individually and wearing the UN uniform. It controls a nuclear force consisting of 50-100 mixed land-mobile and undersea-based missiles, averaging one megaton per weapon. The land force is stationed and deployed in territorial enclaves equitably allocated among continents and areas, for minimum temptation and likelihood of seizure by any single nation.
Government powers are distributed to three branches. Without assuming that the Anglo-Saxon mold would necessarily be imposed on the new system, it can be assumed that primary functions would exist in some recognizable form, that they would be to some degree separated, and that each would be carried on through some appropriate organs or agencies.
A bicameral legislative organ is empowered to make decisions, on a weighted voting basis, within the scope of the organization’s powers for peacekeeping.
The executive organ is operated by elected personnel, with administrative services carried out by international civil service personnel. The executive council gives special weight — but without individual veto — to the most populous, industrially developed, and strategically significant states. Safeguards in the form of political supervision and rotation of personnel discourage usurpation of power by "Praetorian Guards."
All states are bound by compulsory jurisdiction of the World Court for both legal disputes and legal aspects of the political disputes. Justice is administered by an expanded network of international courts, with regional panels. States and international agencies, but not individuals initially, are subjects of international law. An equity tribunal system is created for settlement of primary political disputes, along with greatly expanded mediation, conciliation, and arbitration services, use of rapporteurs, and judgments by the courts ex aequo et bono. The constitution provides for the enforceability of decisions of the courts, for execution of the decisions of the executive, and for the carrying out of the laws passed by the legislature. The central authority itself can be sued, but like the US Government today cannot be forced to comply with court judgments. A human rights court modelled upon the comparable court under the European Community is empowered to hear individual complaints of violations of a covenant of civil rights which would accompany the constitution. Permissive and voluntary organs of cooperation exist in the economic, social, scientific and technological, and cultural fields as now, still without powers of compulsion except under special provisions dealing with essential services, health, public safety, and the like.
The model system contains approximately 130 political subunits, all nominally independent states (except such vestigial remainders of the colonial era as the Caribbean islands excluded from the West Indian Federation and the islands of Polynesia and Melanesia not subsumed under any possible federation or confederation succeeding the Trust Territory of the Pacific).
National governments continue to exist in these units, to make, execute and enforce domestic laws with respect to all areas presently inforodomestico except for the raising and provisioning of armed forces, the declaration and waging of war, and the unhampered research, development, and production of military material. These hitherto untrammeled rights are limited by the terms of the new international constitution to the right to maintain sufficient police forces to ensure domestic security. The formula for such forces is derived from the present size of local, civil, and state police, plus national law enforcement personnel such as federal marshals, customs agents, border patrols, law enforcement agents and investigators, and certain militia. (There are obvious discrepancies between states, depending on their internal security problems and practices.)
The states are open to international inspection against violation of the disarmament agreement, with permanent inspection of power and research nuclear reactors, accelerators and other high energy equipment, electronic industries, steel mills, aircraft and space vehicle production, ports, railheads, marshalling yards, major airports and rocket launching facilities, central budgeting, bookkeeping, accounting and auditing agencies, principal research and development operations and installations, and all other key and strategic points in the national economy.
The international inspectorate also monitors the atmosphere for clandestine explosions, for underground nuclear tests, primarily through robot seismic stations combined with on-site inspections of suspicious events, and against tests in outer space through sensing devices in internationally operated solar satellites. In general, space technology remains in national and in some cases (communications, broadcasting, transportation, messenger service, etc.) private hands, but under international inspection. The international authority owns and operates only those space vehicles required both as a military deterrence system and to monitor enforcement of the disarmament agreement. Satellite observation vehicles are equipped to observe optically, electronically, and with infra-red and other sensing and detection devices, and serviced by an internationally controlled ground detection and tracking network.
Largely because of the requirements of the disarmament program, a significant "UN presence" exists in all countries. The secondary aspects of this presence provide dissemination of impartial factual information as well as continuous liaison with local and national authorities.
There is no attempt here to spell out all the details of the proposed system. Three points, however, require elaboration. The system of representation is among the most difficult problems. The financial problem is of crucial practicality. And the whole enterprise rests on a comprehension of the historical requirements for peaceful change.
A legislative body representing all of the constituent units would, as indicated, "make the laws." It can be deducted from this that a voting system would have to be devised that would reflect the relative size, power, and standing of the constituent units. The present system of one-nation-one-vote in the UN General Assembly is not appropriate to a system commanding decisive military (and therefore political) power. It is excessively utopian (if shadings can be distinguished in the present exercise) to believe that under foreseeable historical circumstances representation largely proportionate to population alone would be politically acceptable to the principal powers. The legislative power would thus be exercised on a weighted basis that acceptably combines population and capacity to contribute to the power of the system. Such a formula must assure the United States (and presumably everyone else) that vital decisions would not be made by any but the most substantial majorities, including the United States.
Thus, while there can be no individual veto, the great power veto will in this partial sense be extended into a limited world government. The precise formula for ensuring appropriate weight to the principal contributors while protecting the rights of the smaller nations has many possible variations, some of which were embodied in the voting arrangements in the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. A bicameral legislature excels, through its upper house, at protecting the rights of the smaller units, while a unicameral body can do the same for the larger members by means of a dual vote.
Under this model, a qualified majority — two-thirds or three-fourths or even four-fifths — would be necessary to avoid control by a numerical majority that commanded only a minor fraction of the world’s industrial power, financial ability, cultural level, etc. Further protection to the now vulnerable principal powers might take additional forms: for example, a legislative council in which the major nations would have a predominant vote (but no individual veto); a system of separation of powers between the branches of government as in the United States; and emphasis on the special position of the major nations on the executive branch.
The one design, however, which could not be applied successfully would be the Calhoun concept of the concurrent majority (in this case between the central authority and its constituencies) with its implied right of secession. "Effective control" has to mean the power to maintain the union.
Little understanding exists of the problem of civil war under a world government. The new regime will be faced with a continuous agenda of problems stemming from political ambition, inequalities, avarice, irrational behavior, the inhumanity of man to man, and the use or threat of violence to achieve political or social ends. This prospect can be ruled out only by the untenable assumption that history will have run its course and an end put to its dynamic, refractory, and otherwise troublesome qualities. Thus a world government, even if it could be created, would be subject to continuing pressures, the most clamant of which could lead to civil war on an international scale, accompanied by unbalancing evasions of the disarmament agreement.
In our model the crucial trick is to ensure that no large-scale civil war could take place to test the "union." For war on major scale would gravely threaten the system. It would revive production and, given the instability of such a situation, the probable use of weapons of mass destruction. In any event such a war would be no more tolerable under a world government that it would be today, and for precisely the same humanitarian reasons.
If there is a single answer, it is in the realm of peaceful change. In terms of its viability and durability, the compelling need for the world authority will be a rather more exigent version of the problem that pervades all modern history — the need for adequate provisions in the international system to accommodate the dynamic forces making for change, without allowing them to lead to war.
In 1962 nuclear weapons have temporarily suppressed a significant fraction of the pressures which in other times might well have expressed themselves violently. Without that kind of deterrent situation, violence could become the order of the day unless there existed effective provisions for peaceful change. Flexibility and capacity to adapt to change in time and with foresight would be particularly needful in view of the proposed nuclear monopoly in the hands of the central authority. Otherwise the nightmare prospect is of world order at the price of world tyranny — a kind of global Holy Alliance to preserve the status quo. The system must, through its legislative action, its executive implementation, and its judicial interpretation, allow for changes in fact, in law, and in the system itself.
No attempt is made here to cost the model. But some orders of magnitude can be suggested by comparing the present annual cost of the UN system — roughly 0 million — with the figure used by Clark and Sohn as a sample budget for limited world government in 1980 — billion (a figure well below their own estimate of maximum available UN revenue, billion, calculated on the basis of 2-1/2 per cent of every nation’s Gross National Product). The Clark-Sohn plan assumes a UN Peace Force of 400,000 with a reserve of 900,000 costing some .6 billion per annum. Other costs of the organization they estimate at billion. To this they add approximately billion for economic development purposes.2
Some figures of a lesser magnitude were recently developed by Colonels Cannon and Jordan. They estimate the cost to the UN of international military personnel per man per day with minimum equipment as eight to ten dollars. A lightly armed brigade of 7,000 men would cost million per year, not including capital costs for bases, etc.3A balanced force of half a million could well cost up to the Clark-Sohn figure of billion if it must buy, build, maintain, and modernize a broad arsenal of equipment and personnel for world-wide missions.
Finally, technical developments could revise upward the Clark-Sohn billion figure for operating costs, which include those of maintaining disarmament agreements. Recent estimates today speak of a cost of .5 billion to install inspection machinery for a test ban alone, and 0 million per year to operate it.
The picture we have sketched out, even with self-conscious efforts to be conservative, strains our credulity. But it would be beyond all reason without certain basic assumptions.
Continuing in as conservative a vein as can plausibly be applied to the topic, let us make explicit the basic assumptions that underlie our model, both as to the technical state of the art, and as to the political preconditions.
To make the problem manageable, it is assumed that at the time the new regime comes into being there has been no technical breakthrough such as would make meaningless the centralization of effective power. This assumption rules out devices that would enable a single individual or small group to terrorize the world, i.e., such potentially unbalancing developments as the controlled use of antimatter, the creation of a Kahn-type Doomsday machine, or the achievement of universally effective magical powers through psychological or biochemical means.
But it must also be assumed that direction of modern science and technology is essentially irreversible. It can perhaps be slowed down or even stopped, either by some universal catastrophe or under a disarmament agreement that curtails the intensive allocation to armaments of economic and human resources. But the processes of fission and fusion, the cultivation of viruses of high toxicity, and the design of engines of delivery cannot be unlearned. Moreover, assuming as we must that atomic power may become economical and fusion power when harnessed even more so, all of these technologies will be practiced under total disarmament in their peaceable aspects. So however comprehensive a disarmament agreement, however much political power is transferred to a world government, and even if no significant manpower is actually working on nuclear, chemical, and bacteriological weapons, or on constructing military aircraft, ships, rockets, or space vehicles, there will always remain implicit in technically advanced societies the capacity to turn again to the production and fabrication of engines of war, probably with fair rapidity.
On any count, it is unsafe to assume that the ideological and power struggle between communism and the West will not continue indefinitely. This assumption of course throws into question any program requiring that both sides subordinate to a supranational authority themselves, their power, and their ambitions. This is the central dilemma of world politics today, and it applies with ultimate force to the proposition of world government. The logical trap is completed with the familiar paradox: given a continuation unabated of communist dynamism, the subordination of states to a true world government appears impossible; but if the communist dynamic were greatly abated, the West might well lose whatever incentive it has for world government.
For purposes of this exercise, we assume that, if the communists would agree, the West would favor "a world effectively controlled by the United Nations." The remaining question is then how to transform and tame the forces of communism, in any event to the point where the present international system might be radically reshaped. Such a transformation is theoretically possible, but only under two conditions: first, that through evolutionary processes communist doctrine becomes drained of its messianic quality, foregoes its imperialistic ambitions, and comes to accept the notion of a higher authority — a notion traditionally anathema to its doctrine. The other condition, which puts the possibility within a more foreseeable time span, is a crisis, a war, or a brink-of-war situation so grave or commonly menacing that deeply-rooted attitudes and practices are sufficiently shaken to open the possibility of a revolution in world political arrangements. The assumption has to be made here that one or the other of these conditions has come about and that the communists have consequently been brought to a significant mitigation of their doctrine.
Thus we assume a world in which relations between East and West are characterized by significantly higher degrees of mutual trust, internationalist spirit, and unaggressiveness. But there is little in history to justify the belief that, without the communist threat in its present form, the world political environment would be inherently stable. We have postulated by necessity a willing acceptance of limited world government by the great powers. We then further postulate either acceptance by or imposition on all other nations of such a regime. This at once sets up future instabilities. Today the foci of instability are in third areas, centering on economic disparities and nationalistic strivings for independence, which of course Soviet and Chinese policies purposefully exploit. There is no reason to assume the disappearance under limited world government of the dynamic factors — the intergroup competitions, the racial and ethnic tensions, and the gross economic inequalities — which permeate human history and create the conditions for political upheaval. History, short of catastrophe, is not discontinuous. To modify von Clausewitz, limited world government is a form of international conflict carried on under other institutional arrangements than unlimited state sovereignty. Thus, as the framework for international stability becomes established under a benign form of world order, the detailed disputes of a chronic or secondary nature can confidently be expected to re-emerge.
A crucial feature of the system would be its universality. The inclusion of all presently divided countries could come about in one of two ways: through their unification or through alterations in the issues that had once divided them. These conditions would have to apply across the board. It is conceivable that a world order could embrace divided Germany, Korea, and Vietnam, the Arab states still at war with Israel, Formosa and mainland China still in conflict, and apartheid remaining South Africa’s policy. But what has to be assumed as a condition sinequanon is that the parties to such conflicts have either explicitly or tacitly concluded not to attempt to settle them by force. In the case of the lesser powers, there must be the conviction that they will not be permitted to settle their disputes by force. It might be argued that this reasoning is tautological: that "effective UN control" is impossible without solution of the most acute political disputes or, conversely, that such centralization of power automatically ends such disputes. No such assumption is made here, on the ground that a limited world government, to be even theoretically practical, must be embodied in a realistic environment in which old unsolved problems still exist, along with a host of new ones. Above all, we are assuming that it is not historically impossible to transform one kind of international system into another, profoundly different kind, characterized by the centralization of effective power.
For the United States, as well as for the other countries, a threshold will have been crossed from one historical condition to another, drastically different one. However many stages it takes, however tacit or explicit the labels, however gradual or violent the process, there is a Rubicon that divides the Gaul of basically untramelled national sovereignty from the Tuscany of meaningful supranational authority. Nothing could be more dangerous to sound thinking and planning than to elide this fundamental truth.
By whatever process, and under whatever name, the agency that is to "effectively control" world affairs requires in the most important ways the design customarily associated with government. A central authority with effective powers in the realms of disarmament and the settlement of international disputes, and with the capacity to deal effectively with breaches of the peace and acts of aggression, and above all in possession of the most vital attribute of government — a preponderance of military power — is a government, however limited. But it need not be assumed that the organization would have to take on all or even most of the functions of government, particularly in the economic and social realm. The United States Constitution, while granting great powers to the Federal Government, reserves to the states the powers not explicitly delegated. Our model does the same. After physical security and integrity, the most sensitive areas of national sovereignty usually involve such matters as economic and trade policy, immigration practice, civil rights, social welfare, education, and the like. Our model excludes those matters traditionally barred from international cognizance as being essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of the constituent states.
Under the first of our alternative roads — the pacific evolution of the Communist world, including China — it is difficult to foresee a limited world government within twenty-five years at the earliest, fifty years more conservatively. If, however, it came about as a result of a series of unnerving trips to or over the brink, it could come about at any time. The assumption here, chiefly for logical convenience, is a time period of five to fifteen years from now.
What is the basis for the apportionment of forces earlier suggested between center and parts? Strategic analysis supplies the tentative answers.
"Effective control" connotes a relative monopoly of political power, accompanied by preponderant military force, at the center of the system. The world (sic) "relative" indicates that the power relationship between the center and the parts is one of degree. Some examples illustrate the equation. In the United States the people have the constitutional right to "keep and bear arms"; the government monopoly is legally abridged to this extent. In the Congo Republic the central army is, or was, in fact overmatched by provincial forces; there was thus no effective central government. In Kuomintang China the military power of the National Government was often balanced by the military power of the warlords; the writ of the government thus could not extend uniformly through the country.
So under a supranational government the degrees of relative power as between center and parts can occupy a wide range. This range can be more systematically illustrated along a scale of military power on both sides (as in figure A.).
(a) At the minimal level of supranational power, the system could conceivably be in a fine balance: central authority might be able to exercise "effective control" on the basis of its sole possession of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction (a variant of the case under the 1946 Acheson-Lilienthal-Baruch plan), with the constituent nations retaining conventional armaments up to present high levels or even higher. The principle of control would be one of almost pure deterrence, based on the theory that the absence of war is due to the threat of nuclear retaliation.
However, as the doctrine of massive retaliation demonstrated rather quickly, such a scheme labors under great handicaps stemming from two factors. One is that under an umbrella of fear of general war, all sorts of mischief can be made by powers who ordinarily have no such leverage. The second classic flaw is the unpromising prospect of vast devastation as the only available response to assaults on the integrity of the system. In this sense the United Nations would only be taking the place of the United States in attempting to enforce the peace, with the same drawbacks plus the additional one that failure to enforce its writ would undermine the whole system. The questions of credibility of threat and of rigidity of both doctrine and means combine to rule out this solution.
(b) The central authority might possess both a nuclear and conventional capability, while the constituent national units would also possess conventional forces. This situation for the UN would be to some degree analogous to several situations today: the US visavis Communist China and West Germany, or the Soviet Union visavis China.
Such an apportionment of power does not seem sufficiently stabilizing to add up to "effective control." Given equally balanced conventional forces, the only difference is at the margin, in the possession of nuclear capabilities. Again, the self-deterring nature of such power encourages the constituent parts of the system to frustrate its effective working. In this case, however, the destabilizing factor is not the central authority’s possession of nuclear weapons. It is the retention of significant conventional forces in the hands of the constituent units.
(c) Next in line would be a combination of modest conventional and nuclear capacity at the center, with disarmament down to internal security levels among constituent nations. This is commented on at the end of the section.
(d) This and the next two possible combinations would involve the total elimination of all nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, but retention of some military power both at the center and in the parts, yet of significantly different orders of magnitude. In the first such case, the central authority, unlike Chiang Kai-shek in Nanking (and Chungking), would by its preponderance of conventional forces hold a decisive edge over any predictable combination of "provincial" forces (always subject to the possibility of civil war in the shape of sufficiently widespread defection from the central authority). In theory, such an arrangement would bring the world back to prewar conditions, but with two significant differences. For the first time there would exist a central authority with at least an initial preponderance of force. Second, the Pandora’s box of nuclear (and viral and bacterial and radiological) knowledge will still be no guarantee against hidden stockpiles. Thus this scheme would provide no deterrent whatever to the commission of nuclear crimes after secret preparations.
(e) Still lower down the relative force scale would be a central authority equipped with a modest level of conventional forces visavis national units completely disarmed down to the levels of internal security contemplated by typical proposals for general and complete disarmament. The same disabilities apply.
(f) Lowest on the scale would be a totally disarmed world in which no significant military forces were in being at any level. This was the first inference that could logically be drawn from the September 1959 proposal of Premier Khrushchev (as well as the 1927 and 1933 Soviet antecedents of the proposal). Presumably, under such a scheme there would be police-type forces at both levels, lightly armed with nothing of higher caliber than machine guns, plus riot-type devices. (At true zero on the scale there might be nightsticks, perhaps supplemented by bottles of itching powder, tanks of laughing gas and mild dysentery germs, and airguns designed to shoot pellets of tranquillizing drugs.)
On the basis of the assumption made earlier, the conclusion is inescapable that the central authority, in addition to its conventional military capacity, will have to offset the inherent possibility of evasion by being equipped with nuclear weapons, along with delivery systems adequate to deal with the realistic possibilities of violation (i.e., alternative c). For the very logic of "effective control" requires placing in the hands of the central authority military forces adequate to deal with breaches of the peace and acts of aggression, through whatever means are necessary to preserve a preponderance of power at the center, even against the contingency of clandestine production of nuclear weapons. Exhypothesi, the central authority would need to retain a nuclear capability adequate to deter any reasonable expectation of clandestine violation and consequent attempt to destabilize or even destroy the new system.
It can be seen that even under a radically designed system of authority in a disarmed world, the problem of deterrence will persist, including some of the features that characterize it today. The situation facing the central authority would not be too different from that confronting the United States in its need to be equipped with forces, both conventional and nuclear, adequate to deter any likely combination of hostile forces. Indeed, this is the problem inside any society. But the special feature in the new situation would be an element of profound uncertainty. Today, defensive forces are designed to deter known quantities or qualities of war-making capability. But our postulated regime, even with a good inspection system, will be to a degree uncertain whether nuclear weapons are hidden or being secretly made, some highly potent nerve agent being developed in an isolated biological laboratory, or some commanding weapon secreted illicitly into the payload of a communication, weather, navigation, and other satellite. These possibilities, however statistically improbable, would pose anew the problem of deterrence in a different calculus, both for the general authority and for individual states such as the United States in making its own calculations.
One mad tribal ruler in a future Congo might not be able to bring the rest of the world to its knees. But twenty-five rockets, with megaton warheads previously secreted or secretly produced in Soviet or Chinese facilities, could supply to those nations an inordinate amount of political and strategic power. Adequate inspection would of course be designed to preclude such a development. But deterrence from the center is the second line of defense, the ultimate safeguard: deterring in the first instance from clandestine production, in the second from political threat, and ultimately from actual military use.
To sum up — a world government must be in a position to deter the unknown possibility of clandestine evasion. This means that the central authority must have a nuclear capability. (It might well also mean maintaining stockpiles of chemical agents, much as national governments have done in the past, against the possibility of a future "gas attack — or its late twentieth century counterpart.) Otherwise, given the low base point (zero) from which honest nations start in a disarmed world, a nuclear capability that at 1962 levels would be marginal, scarcely useful as more than a political irritant, would come to assume incommensurate proportions in terms not only of destructive capacity but as a potent means of psychological warfare.
The problem of deterrence, in short, will exist under a disarmament agreement even if the religious wars of our age come to resemble less the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and more the seventeenth and eighteenth.
The appropriate degree of relative force would, we conclude, involve total disarmament down to police and internal security levels for the constituent units, as against a significant conventional capability at the center backed by a marginally significant nuclear capability.
Some of the major difficulties have already been cited or implied in the course of discussion. Others can be noted. They are summarized briefly under this heading.
Perhaps the most provocative feature of our futuristic landscape is the subsidence of communist expansionism along with its doctrinal hostility to all elements of the world not under its writ. The picture of a disarmed, centrally governed world is intolerably romantic without the assumption we have made — perhaps equally romantic — that this limited but crucial degree of supranational authority is genuinely accepted by communist nations as strategically safe and ideologically palatable. To an important degree the same would be true of the United States, of such prideful nations as France, and of the many countries only now undergoing the exhilaration of intense nationalism. Is it possible that the Soviet Union and China could be brought to abandon their messianic ambitions and subordinate themselves to the writ of a higher authority — a notion which runs counter to all the teaching of communist doctrine? Would only a damaging war make China a willing party in the foreseeable future? Above all, even if the Soviet leaders genuinely desired a disarmament agreement, is there any chance that they would accept its corollary — detente, and international security arrangements to substitute for national force—conditions which the West tends to assume are indispensable accompaniments to disarmament? The difference is of course profound: Soviet doctrine repudiates the status quo and apparently conceives of disarmament as a cheaper, safer way to carry out its policies; the Western position requires that those who disarm accept a new order policed at least as effectively as in an armed world, with supranational power substituting for national.
For that matter, would the United States itself seriously consider disbanding its own armaments and abrogating to an international authority beyond its direct control the authority and the power to do those things which in modern history have been the prerogative of the nation? It is not simply a question of good faith by the policy-makers. Would the United States Senate ratify such a scheme? So long as communism persists as a threat to American society, is there any chance of such a scheme being agreed to? (And if there were no communist menace, would anyone be worrying about the need for such a revolution in international political arrangements?)
The quick answers to these questions, so put, tend to be negative. For the one sound basis of community — genuine consensus — is not yet apparent between the chief actors on the world stage. This finding needs to be examined more closely.
We accept here the equation according to which wholesome community building at any level is a process in which consensus (consent and acquiescence in the general ground rules and overall values of the system) comes first. It may then be followed by development of a community with some organic coherence. Such community in turn is the base on which edifices of government and, finally, of law can be erected. A "normal" historical process, in which ever-larger units evolve through customs unions, confederation, regionalism, etc., until ultimately the larger units coalesce under a global umbrella, could take up to two hundred years, on past performance figures, and even this may be optimistic.
It is technology which requires us to accelerate the process. Yet nothing in technology has yet shown itself capable of altering the elements of the basic equation. Conceivably the rate of cultural and political change will henceforth increase as a function of enlarged ability to educate, inform, and bring together large numbers of people. But even if mass media, cultural exchange, and generally better international communication were to succeed in lessening the incidence and virulence of nationalism and xenophobia, the internationalizing process confronts a built-in obstacle — the immense vested powers, interests, and traditions of government. In virtually every country there exists an establishment that carries from generation to generation the legacies of the national past.
Most "peace movements" assert that "peoples" regard each other as brothers, in contradistinction to governments and their vested establishments, seen as forces of resistant conservatism. If this is so, the only agency requiring a genuine change of heart is government. But the thesis is not entirely convincing. It is by no means certain that the American people, for example, are presently ready to vote the national military establishment out of existence in favor of an international agency controlled by a combination of nations.
The international north-south conflict, characterized by bitter racial resentments and vast economic disparities, is an equally obstructive roadblock to the denationalization of power, unless those at the short end of the social or economic scale become convinced that they would come into what they regard as their birthright more quickly or more surely under a would government. Possibly this could be demonstrated on the basis that the voice of the presently power-lacking states would increase in the uses of world power. But power could not be simply transferred from those who now hold it to those who do not, under the guise of a world government. The safeguards and weightings cited earlier would indeed be designed to see that this did not happen. Only significant reduction in the tensions growing out of recent colonial relationships and the economic disparities could overcome this barrier to achievement of the model.
A related problem is that at least a third of the countries in the world are only now beginning to traverse the stages of nationalism which traditionally precede, accompany, and follow national independence. If some of them are also going to experience the acute pathology of malignant nationalism in the fashion of Germany, Italy, and Japan in living memory, the prospect is dim for consensus leading to formation of a universal community with a preponderance of power at the center.
I have suggested that an alternative road may bypass the main path of history, shortcircuiting the organic stages of consensus, value formation, and the experiences of common enterprise generally believed to underlie political community. This relies on a grave crisis or war to bring about a sudden transformation in national attitudes sufficient for the purpose. According to this version, the order we examine may be brought into existence as a result of a series of sudden, nasty, and traumatic shocks. But does this sufficiently lay the basis for genuine community, adequate to create a durable world order? The transforming experience, whether evolutionary or revolutionary, must, to achieve the foundation of consensus requisite for community, be enough to reach and move great masses of people, many of whom are not now touched by governmental processes, or afortiori by international relations. In the end, the question of feasibility can only be answered with a prediction: once critical mass had taken place, however tentatively or suspiciously, a new and essentially unpredictable dynamic would have been set in motion, sufficient to confound predictions made from this side of the line.
National disarmament is a condition sinequanon for effective UN control. Yet the known difficulties of general disarmament are overwhelming. This is not the place to argue its desirability or undesirability. What we have assumed is that perhaps as a consequence of a massive crisis it is neither inherently nor technically impossible to design a program whereby all nations scrap their armaments down to the police level, with a reasonable probability of detecting significant evasion of violation through inspection arrangements. Security for the United States, as well as for other nations, could — again in theory — be assured by phasing out national forces only as international forces were satisfactorily in position and under the effective control of a "responsible" agency (although it should be clear that the notions of even a weighted majority as to what is "responsible" will not coincide every time with those of the United States). Technology may contribute to making the inspection task less onerous and less intrusive than at present, through robot mechanisms even now foreseeable. The political hurdle attending penetration of the Soviet Union may be further mitigated by such a move as unilateral American creation of an open world, so to speak, by making available to the United Nations all pictures taken by SAMOS and other observation satellites, of both the Soviet Union and the United States.
But none of this implies that total disarmament is a political possibility in the foreseeable future even though it is technically possible, and even though it is not unthinkable strategically given adequate supranational surrogates for national arms. It is to say that, without it, effective UN control is not possible.
The present roadblocks to universality in the United Nations are, first, the China problem, and second, the unwillingness of the Western powers to formalize the division of Germany, Korea, or Vietnam by consenting to their admission. As for the remaining areas not yet represented (now that the United States has held its nose and swallowed the admission to the UN of Outer Mongolia, as a source of potential nationalistic tension between China and Russia), virtually any territory that gains its independence, however small, nonviable, or incapable of governing itself, is fairly sure to be admitted to the society of nations under the present UN dispensation.
So to achieve the necessary universality, China and the divided countries would have to be either unified, or admitted to participation as presently divided. Unification of Germany, Korea, and Vietnam, and acceptance by each of the other’s continued existence, can be brought about only by conditions which are presently unlikely. To make disarmament and effective UN control dependent on solutions of those problems renders both prospects illusory (and it is indeed this logic which tends to discourage any serious thinking about either).
However, a global authority established with the consent of the great powers, even if those special problems had not yet been solved, could by its primafacie universality resolve the problem of representation. For unlike the conventional American view of the United Nations, membership in the new regime, far from being a privilege, would be mandatory. As indicated earlier, none of these problems would by themselves have to be finally solved in order to set up such an organization. But they would no longer be solvable by force.
The difficulty today of raising million per month to finance the United Nations Congo operation contrasts vividly with a scheme whose monthly budget, according to our estimates, would be approximately a hundred times as great. All one can say is that, if agreement were reached on disarmament, with the great financial savings ensuing, and on the arming of an international authority, provisions would have to be made for funding it. Doubtless, those provisions would have to improve on the present method, and might work on a semi-automatic basis through percentages of national tax collections. In addition, revenue sources not tied to individual nations might be assigned to the central authority — e.g., tolls on international water-ways and revenues derived from rescommunis such as Antarctica, petroleum reserves under the high seas, space rights, etc. The point is that, if we can assume one, we have to assume the other. The same is true for other questions that arise in the implementation of the basic agreement. Provisions would simply have to be made for territorial enclaves adequate for the headquarters, military establishment, and the inspection organization. Other details would involve recruitment, deployment, procedure, codes, transport, communications, and the thousand and one details of government. Each of these matters poses inordinate difficulties. But the point is that they are not the first and prime matters to be solved. If the solution of the prior question can be assumed, there will be time enough for detailed blueprints.
As indicated earlier, there is no theoretical reason why the present United Nations could not be transformed by extensive Charter amendment into an instrument of effective global control. Alternatively, the process could be a completely new start, in the way the Articles of Confederation were scrapped to write the American Constitution. But it is not a terribly important point which method is used. The essential point is the transfer of the most vital element of sovereign power from the states to a supranational government.
It is clear that, under the hypothetical circumstances, even the problem of amending the present Charter (subject to the veto) is not particularly meaningful, for it puts the matter in the wrong perspective. The paramount issue in creation an "effective UN" would not be first of all the difficulty of amending the Charter, but that of reaching the political agreement and establishing new ground rules about the possession and use of military power in the world. If this were feasible, it would surely be a secondary question whether to incorporate the changes in the present Charter, or to write a new one. The overwhelming central fact would still be the loss of control of their military power by individual nations. If this becomes achievable, the details will not be insurmountable.
The model finally needs to be tested against major threats to its stability and integrity. This we can do using as criteria half a dozen familiar types of threats emanating from expansionist, imperialist, revolutionary, or other aggressive forces. First, however, a word about the source of such threats.
Among the prime assumptions made here is that the present ideological and power conflict may continue indefinitely into the future. But it is not enough of a test of the viability and durability of different kinds of international political and governmental arrangements that they be capable of countering communist aggression. The communist threat grows out of the existing world system and feeds on its weaknesses and imperfections. The inadequacy of the present system engenders tension and conflict which must be dealt with wholly apart from the communist problem. The degree to which any international system has stability and operates within a tolerable equilibrium defines the situation with which communism must deal, and thus the field within which communism (or any other political force) can operate aggressively.
The ability of a system to deal with such aggressive behavior depends to an important extent on the means by which it can resolve instabilities and disequilibria, the extent to which this is done preventively, the extent to which it can apply generally acceptable notions of justice, and its capacity to adapt flexibly to a changing environment. Thus an international system built and aimed exclusively at countering possible communist aggression, even through in the short run it performs its mission successfully, would not by itself satisfy the requirement for a durable and viable system. For a world system by definition addresses itself to the whole fabric of relationships between nations, between cultures, and between economic units; over time; and in the face of changing problems.
While the hypothetical system elaborated earlier must be tested against its capacity to respond to the kinds of threats we can presently envisage, there may be a different and unforeseeable order of threat to cope with, once one assumes a vastly different political setting. This dynamic quality could affect both communist threats and threats from other sources equally designed to disequilibrate, capture, or destroy the new system.
Finally, the choice is not necessarily between an international system incapable of coping with important threats and one which can deal successfully with every contingency in the spectrum. At one end of the scale, the present international system has some capacity to cope, even with communist menaces. At the other end of the scale, we can guess that there would be finite limits to the capacity of a supranational system to handle such maximum challenges as international civil war. A civil war, domestic or international, can gather such force as to end the preponderance at the center. The system impressionistically sketched out in this paper, while its capacities go significantly beyond those presently in sight, remains subject to the basic laws of political life.
How, then, might our model be expected to cope with major destabilizing actions on the part of individual nations?
The proposed system would explicitly forbid national possession of weapons of mass destruction, of the means of delivery, and of the trained personnel required to mount an attack. Thus the component nations would not have the capability to wage strategic war as we now conceive it. The inspection system would be designed to minimize the possibility of successful evasion or violation of this prohibition. A capacity to threaten nuclear war would arise under two circumstances. One would be a successfully executed violation that evaded the detection system. The reserve nuclear deterrent at the center would be designed to deter surprise attack of this scale, and thus discourage such attempts in the first place.
The other potential for strategic war would arise from the deliberate, overt repudiation of the new order and the political system representing it. The erection of a system of government presupposes the will on the part of its members and its governing institutions to make it work. Making it work includes the enforcement of the laws and, above all, the organic law which gives the government both legitimacy and its relative monopoly of force. If the system did not abort such violation by imposing timely sanction upon a violator in the form of immediate seizure of the forbidden facilities, punishment of those responsible, etc., the danger to the nations who relied upon it would clearly be immense. To abdicate responsibility for self-preservation through a failure of nerve would confront the world with far worse perils than it now faces, given the marginal nature of the authority’s nuclear force. The ultimate question would then be the utilization of the international force after failure to use it preventively. The failure to make early use of initially superior forces to overcome a major violation of the established order is reminiscent of the 1930s. The details of such a scenario in the future are difficult to foresee. Can one postulate this time a more purposeful and intelligent governing mentality? The experience of the postwar period makes for moderate optimism on this score (offset, however, by the new dimension of war by accident).
In the end, dangers in such breakdowns of the system need to be measured against the dangers of breakdowns in the current international system, at the present level of armaments. On balance, if there were any reasonable chance of achieving the system adumbrated here, the hazards inherent in its possible later collapse through failure of nerve or will may well be out-weighed by the possibility that it would in fact work.
It would seem far more plausible for a threat to arise to the system in the form of hostile movements of armed men, i.e., through conventional warfare. Particularly in the first years after the establishment of the system, large numbers of trained men would exist in reserve in numerous countries. Even with internal security forces limited to sidearms and light field weapons, it would not be difficult for sizeable numbers of men to be recruited and armed clandestinely with (or even conceivably without) the connivance of national governments. Soviet man-power could under these circumstances make real the picture that always leapt into the Western mind when the Soviets called for nuclear disarmament: that of Soviet hordes overrunning Russia’s neighbors in Europe and the Middle East.
Once more, of course, the real test of the capacity of the system to cope with such a threat is a function not only of its military capability but of the purposefulness and determination behind it. Here again, history supplies mixed evidence. Under NATO, for example, the argument for a nuclear "shield" has been the threat of overwhelming conventional forces from the East. But, as in the 1930s, the truth is that the free nations actually enjoy a clear superiority, even in numbers of military-age youth, if only the West were to make use of it. If an act of aggression were to occur under the world government, and the responsible powers best able to influence the actions of the organization refused to use its powers, or were hopelessly divided, or were unable to enlist adequate support from the necessary majority of nations, the system would not respond "effectively." No voting arrangements, however ingenious, could force a decision from an unwilling majority. In this sense the key to effective response does not lie in international parliamentary arrangement, any more than the problem in the 1930s was the requirement for unanimity in the League Assembly, or the reason for failure to act in Hungary in 1956 the Soviet veto in the Security Council.
If the political organs were unresponsive, it could not be expected that the civil servants of the proposed organization could automatically respond to aggression, any more than General MacArthur, for example, automatically responded to the Korean aggression without Washington’s orders, or Dag Hammarskjold responded with such powers as he then possessed to the British-French-Israeli military attack on Egypt in 1956. Constitutional arrangements and parliamentary rules, after all, go only a fraction of the total distance in determining the way in which the body politic as a whole will respond to a crisis. For purposes of analysis we assume that the system would work. We assume that its principal actors will have the determination to make it work in the face of a major assault on its integrity, in the same way the leaders of the Union reacted in 1861 or de Gaulle a century later. How, then, would the system cope with an armed attack by one nation on another or on the international force itself on a scale that could be plausibly prepared and executed by a nation subject to the system of inspection built into the program?
My undocumented conclusion is that trained and mobile conventional forces contemplated here should be adequate to counter a single surprise thrust of moderate dimensions. Ten air-transportable divisions, for example, trained for vertical envelopment and armed with the latest field weapons, transport, and communications should be able to cope with the sort of secretly prepared attack across one nation’s borders of the dimension likely under the circumstances. Beyond that, the strategic nuclear deterrent in the hands of the central authority would presumably deter conventional attack on a massive scale in the same fashion as in American hands it presumably deterred Soviet conventional aggression in Europe in the late 1940s and early 1950s. (The latter analogy rests of course on an unproved hypothesis, as does the doctrine of massive retaliation associated with the preponderance in nuclear weapons.)
The international force would be decreasingly capable of coping with higher levels of aggression involving several countries, up to a point describable as true international civil war. This scenario is somewhat easier to depict. An outbreak of violence in many places of the globe, with national armies springing up, internal insurrection breaking out, national borders crossed in many places, and so on, poses an ultimately impossible task for the international force, even if it had not by that time been pre-empted, divided, or isolated.
The problem of United States security under such circumstances would then be acute. In some ways it would be analogous to the late 1930s, in other ways to the time of the Korean invasion. The alternatives confronting the United States would not be historically unfamiliar: the simple decision to rearm; whether to escalate the action on the ground with tactical nuclear weapons, or strategically with megaton weapons; or whether to beat a retreat, as in Indochina in 1954, Hungary in 1956, Tibet in the late 1950s, and Laos in 1961. These decisions in turn would depend on variables too numerous and complex to analyze here (although it would be illuminating to experiment with this novel policy problem through political gaming).
Just as aggression by proxy leaves an escape hatch for the great power sponsoring it, so it enables an opposing power to intervene without seeming to challenge its adversary directly. The inhibitions on effective counteraction if Russia or China (or the US) were the aggressor might be appreciably less if done by proxy. In the Greek Civil War and the Korean action the doors remained open at all times for a truce or settlement without either great power having to admit defeat. US support of the rebel forces in Cuba in 1961 involved no real commitment.
If all nations were equally disarmed, however, proxy aggression takes a somewhat different meaning. One power cannot feed significant amounts of war material for use in a third area without soon establishing an observable violation — assuming, as we do, as efficient policing of disarmament. Proxy aggression thus seems an unlikely contingency.
This section and the next deal with the sort of conflict generally labelled "indirect aggression," characteristically ambiguous as to national involvement, formal crossing of borders, and the like. Unconventional warfare between nations and, perhaps, against the central authority may well be the most characteristic type of conflict besetting our proposed system. Ability to cope with it will be subject to the same baffling complexities, uncertainties, and difficulties as torment us today in numerous areas. Whatever the international regime, we cannot safely predict an end to situations of civil war, rebellion, and other forms of internal instability. Nothing about a world government by itself alters the relation between blacks and whites in the Union of South Africa or Southern Rhodesia, or between French and Moslems in Algeria, leftists and rightists in Laos, between Serbs and Croats, Georgians and Great Russians, Austrians and Italians, Israelis and Arabs, Tibetans and Chinese, Moslems and Hindus, Turks and Kurds, etc.
So far as guerrilla warfare is concerned, a well-equipped and purposefully led guerrilla movement conducting irregular operations, living off the country, sabotaging alaMaquis, and, above all, favored by significant elements of the population, could tie up an international army just as easily as a national one, rendering its most potent weapons useless because inapplicable. Indochina, Malaya, Laos, and Lebanon all shared these characteristics in an important degree. None was a pure case of external aggression. All had international and internal ambiguities.
At the political level, the prospects for decisive management of this type of conflict are no clearer. For it must be assumed that ideological, racial, or cultural cleavages would divide a supranational legislature on such ambiguous charges of indirect aggression precisely as a United Nations General Assembly is today divided, and with the same disabling effects when it comes to preventive or enforcement action favoring one side or the other. No international system except a total tyranny complete with the apparatus of a police state would be capable of dealing with certainty with this type of disorder. The answer, if there is one, lies perhaps in peaceful change procedures to the extent that justice and equity can be meted to contending factions. Peaceful change procedures would also be relevant for legislating territorial changes where justified, as Israel, for example, was converted by UN statesmanship from a guerrilla force to a proponent of the established order. Procedures of this sort should, ideally, assure greater economic and social justice. (The international authority would, as noted, probably be limited in its powers to intervene in internal matters of domestic politics and economic and social policy, except insofar as international peace and security were jeopardized.)
On balance, provisions on a global scale for peaceful change and for responsive economic and social programs would go some distance toward removing the sources of conflict that characteristically underlie guerrilla war situations. But there remain the less complicated acts of aggression in the form of guerrilla warfare by a hostile, expansionist force such as international communism. An example might be the Huks in the Philippines in the 1940s. The international force should include a paramilitary capability to be used in appropriate circumstances. But there is no confidence that readier solutions would exist than at present. A system which limits the field of military action to guerrilla-type operations is probably an improvement over the present. But no system can wholly avoid the possibility of guerrilla-type problems arising from either source. It is not likely that an international authority would be more clearly capable of dealing effectively with all such threats than national governments have been able to do.
Everything that has been said about unconventional warfare applies here as well. At one extreme, a central authority might in theory operate a pervasive countersubversion net, creating a political-civil effect somewhere between the Holy Alliance and the Gestapo. At the other extreme, a world authority equipped only with carefully circumscribed powers to deal with formal acts of military aggression and breaches of the peace, even in a wholly disarmed world, would not be capable of coping at all with political subversion.
Under a system of reserved powers, subversion directed against a single government would be a problem for local authorities as before. Only if it involved more than one government would it become an international problem. If it were of the ambiguous type charged to the United Arab Republic (through Syria) in 1958, the appropriate counteraction would, as in Lebanon, appropriately take the form of observation along a border, or in a capital as in Amman in 1958, rather than the deployment of military force. International forces of a non-fighting variety could be utilized as adjuncts of the pacific settlement procedures by the organs of political investigation and pacific settlement, as the Security Council and Assembly used United Nations forces in Lebanon and, for that matter, in the Congo. Our postulated central authority would be as capable as the present United Nations to take such a situation under its cognizance and send observers to report. But we should be clear that its capacity would probably not be appreciably greater in a situation that resembled the Lebanese case in 1958, where a domestic population was almost evenly divided in a bitterly contested election.
For all the disorders of the oblique variety discussed in this and the previous section, it will undoubtedly remain true that the most meaningful answer lies in healthy, politically and socially coherent communities where conditions favoring internal disaffection and receptivity to subversion are held to a minimum. For the other kind — the malignant external pressure not primarily reflecting a lack of internal integrity and cohesion — there is an additional capacity that in the hands of the international authority would enable it to react effectively. That is the means to monitor and report to the executive authorities on hostile propaganda. The authority might also have in hand technical countermeasures, either direct jamming or adequate means of independent transmission, perhaps by 24-hour hovering satellites which would saturate the affected area with continuous FM or television information programs (although probably the rest of the world — at least one-third of it — would have to watch, too). One could conceive of simultaneous translation equipment in the receiving facilities. These possibilities, it should be said, exist today or will in the near future. World government is not needed to utilize them more effectively against subversive action in the form of international propaganda.
As of April 1961, the Soviet Union had threatened nuclear destruction against various nations over 120 times. Without nuclear arms, or for that matter, any significant arms at all, such a policy would lose its present potency. The threat might well remain, but it would be a different one. It would lie in a given nation’s capacity to generate in secret enough of an independent military capability to impose — or threaten to impose — its will on other nations, on the central authority, or on the community in general. The ability to commit such a violation would depend on the comprehensiveness of the inspection system. The ability to get away with it would depend on the nerve and will of the rest of the community. To face down a Soviet or Chinese threat, backed by a suddenly unmasked stockpile of megaton rocket weapons, would require a high order of political courage and determination to resist.
It is conceivable that under such threat the United States would find that the community as a whole was paralyzed or at least bitterly divided as to whether to call the bluff. In this case the threatening power might safely take what it wanted. The threat, that is to say, might work. If the organs of the community failed to save its integrity, if above all the international force were not a guarantor against successful threat or blackmail, there might well be an irresistible demand within this country that the United States cease to reply on the world organization and once more look to its own defenses.
All of these contingencies depend on the Soviets — or anyone else — successfully concealing a violation to the point where a serious threat could be made. The inspection system might of course be inefficient, or incomplete, or even subverted. But we should, I think, also assume that the United States would continue to rely primarily on its own intelligence sources as a powerful supplement to the international monitoring of disarmament.
It seems hardly likely that any disarmament scheme would be acceptable otherwise. If this be assumed, then it becomes far more difficult to take the world by surprise with a military capacity in position, operational and targeted, sufficient to impose its will on the system, without having been discovered in preparation. Under these circumstances early discovery would be likely. In that case the violation would be either aborted or disavowed. If it were not, it must be assumed that appropriate sanctions would be undertaken unless the nations were totally unwilling to make their system work.
Thus a hypothetical model can be constructed, fulfilling the characteristics of "a world effectively controlled by the United Nations." But we are left with profound unanswered questions about it. There is the dilemma of its feasibility — the paradox that it is unattainable when needed, and unneeded when attainable. We concluded that in theory it could come about in the short, medium, or long run by a brink of war — or a war — combined with the development of evolutionary trends that might favor it as the time span stretches out.
The dilemma of scope is related. A global security system which comes about in the short-run future through crisis or by war, its ground rules agreed to at the moment of maximum strain, is likely to be very limited in its non-security functions (as well as being unpredictable in terms of future stability and viability). Conversely, a supranational authority that developed more naturally over time, since it would be more likely to rest on genuine consensus and would thus represent a truer community, would probably encompass more non-security functions, and would be more likely to live comfortably over time with the ground rules embedded in its enabling instruments. But that gets into a time period of no interest to us here.
There is the Aristotelian dilemma of corruption of government into tyranny and there is the potential conflict between a centralized authority and the deep American values of pluralism, diversity, and home rule. As with the American Constitution in the Federal period, once the constituent units relinquish their vital powers to the center, the extent to which encroachment is subsequently resisted, "states’ rights" maintained, and tyranny prevented will depend on factors other than the constitutional provisions agreed to. The lesson of historical experience is that how this happens depends not so much on the language of the organic instrument as on the degree of genuine consensus which went into its making. To the extent that the community is an artificial one, resting largely on fiat, or imposed on one important part of the whole by another important part — to that extent its real underpinnings are so much in doubt that its survival potential could not be predicted.
There is the dilemma of depending for effective world order on total national disarmament. Without disarmament, such a world system is probably unattainable. If general disarmament were ever a reality, a scheme such as that outlined in this paper will need to accompany and follow it. Otherwise, there will be no means to prevent exploitation of a disarmed world in a way which would almost surely bring on a war. The crucial point here is the provision for an effective international force equipped with approximately a half million men and a nuclear capability sufficient to deter any likely level of clandestine violation, a combination most likely to create a stable military environment.
And for the central authority to have nuclear weapons poses one of the most difficult questions about world government: quiscustodietipsoscustodes? And perhaps even more to the point, how keep the keepers relatively insulated from the inevitable efforts to control them, wholly apart from the issue of their supervision?
But the details apart, two problems are sovereign. First is the quantum jump such centralization of military power would mean in historic terms. Second is the presently insurmountable difficulty of bringing into a world-wide system the messianic forces of the communist imperium so long as it is on the historic make. At present the very notion of a politico-military rubric superior to both East and West seems remote. By and large, there has been doctrinal continuity between Litvinov’s assertion that only angels can be impartial and Khrushchev’s statement to Walter Lippmann in April 1961 that there may be neutral nations but there are no neutral men. There are occasional indications that the Soviet Union agrees to an international force after disarmament (as in the third stage of the Soviet proposal of June 2, 1960). But it would be subject to the Security Council veto, and no real advance over Article 43 of the UN Charter agreed to in 1945. In addition, presently insurmountable problems seem to exist as to the sequence of disarmament and control.4
In sum, the structure of the model can be perceived more easily than the fundamental building blocks of consensus and community which would have to underlie it. But we must end by repeating that if such a system ever came into being, even in grave crisis, it would thenceforth have its own inner dynamic. New forces could be set into motion which we cannot now comprehend, leading in the direction of constitutional and organic development that might bear as little resemblance to the first stage as the United States system in 1961 bears to the thirteen colonies under the Articles of Confederation.
Such plans for world government as do analyze in detail (Clark and Sohn, etal.) do not usually deal with feasibility, nor do they customarily appraise United States interests. [Back]
See World Peace Through World Law (2nd Edition, Harvard, 1960). [Back]
See "Military Aspects of a Permanent UN Force" in A United Nations Peace Force, William R. Frye (N.Y., Oceana Publications, 1957), pp.161-71. [Back]
"…the formation of an international army before general and complete disarmament is effected would lead in practice either to the rise of unprecedented ‘super-militarism,’ if the international armed force were stronger than the armies of the Soviet Union and the United States, or to the perpetuation of extreme inequality in international relations if the international force were employed only against small and weak countries." Y. Korovin, "Disarmament and Security," International Affairs (USSR), February 1961, p.57. [Back]